PURPOSE: To assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of orally administered irinotecan in the semi-solid matrix (SSM) formulation, both as a single agent and in sequential combination with capecitabine, in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients were treated with irinotecan given as a single oral daily dose on days 1-5 every three weeks. An additional forty patients were treated with sequential oral irinotecan given daily on days 1-5 followed by capecitabine given orally as a divided dose twice daily on days 6-14 of each three week cycle. RESULTS: The MTD of single-agent oral irinotecan was estimated to be 60 mg/m(2)/day, and DLT included diarrhea, nausea, and neutropenia. In an initial group of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2, the MTD of sequential oral irinotecan/capecitabine was estimated to be 40/1600 mg/m(2)/day with DLT of delayed diarrhea. In a subsequent group of patients with ECOG PS of 0 or 1, the MTD for the sequential combination was 50/2000 mg/m(2)/day. The most common adverse events were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting and dehydration. Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation showed that oral irinotecan was rapidly absorbed and effectively converted to the active metabolite, SN-38, achieving approximately 50% of the SN-38 systemic exposure resulting from an equivalent IV dose. CONCLUSIONS: Oral irinotecan can be safely administered as a single agent or in sequential combination with capecitabine. The efficacy of oral irinotecan should be explored further as a potentially convenient alternative to IV chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: To assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of orally administered irinotecan in the semi-solid matrix (SSM) formulation, both as a single agent and in sequential combination with capecitabine, in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients were treated with irinotecan given as a single oral daily dose on days 1-5 every three weeks. An additional forty patients were treated with sequential oral irinotecan given daily on days 1-5 followed by capecitabine given orally as a divided dose twice daily on days 6-14 of each three week cycle. RESULTS: The MTD of single-agent oral irinotecan was estimated to be 60 mg/m(2)/day, and DLT included diarrhea, nausea, and neutropenia. In an initial group of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2, the MTD of sequential oral irinotecan/capecitabine was estimated to be 40/1600 mg/m(2)/day with DLT of delayed diarrhea. In a subsequent group of patients with ECOG PS of 0 or 1, the MTD for the sequential combination was 50/2000 mg/m(2)/day. The most common adverse events were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting and dehydration. Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation showed that oral irinotecan was rapidly absorbed and effectively converted to the active metabolite, SN-38, achieving approximately 50% of the SN-38 systemic exposure resulting from an equivalent IV dose. CONCLUSIONS: Oral irinotecan can be safely administered as a single agent or in sequential combination with capecitabine. The efficacy of oral irinotecan should be explored further as a potentially convenient alternative to IV chemotherapy.
Authors: Emilio Bajetta; Maria Di Bartolomeo; Luigi Mariani; Antonio Cassata; Salvatore Artale; Sergio Frustaci; Graziella Pinotti; Andrea Bonetti; Ignazio Carreca; Guido Biasco; Luigi Bonaglia; Giovanni Marini; Antonio Iannelli; Diego Cortinovis; Ermina Ferrario; Elena Beretta; Antonio Lambiase; Roberto Buzzoni Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: H C Pitot; R M Goldberg; J M Reid; J A Sloan; P A Skaff; C Erlichman; J Rubin; P A Burch; A A Adjei; S A Alberts; L J Schaaf; G Elfring; L L Miller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M M Borner; J Bernhard; D Dietrich; R Popescu; M Wernli; P Saletti; D Rauch; R Herrmann; D Koeberle; H Honegger; P Brauchli; D Lanz; A D Roth Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: D W Rea; J W R Nortier; W W Ten Bokkel Huinink; S Falk; D J Richel; T Maughan; G Groenewegen; J M Smit; N Steven; J M Bakker; D Semiond; D J Kerr; C J A Punt Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-06-06 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M M Borner; P Schoffski; R de Wit; F Caponigro; G Comella; A Sulkes; G Greim; G J Peters; K van der Born; J Wanders; R F de Boer; C Martin; P Fumoleau Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: J G Slatter; L J Schaaf; J P Sams; K L Feenstra; M G Johnson; P A Bombardt; K S Cathcart; M T Verburg; L K Pearson; L D Compton; L L Miller; D S Baker; C V Pesheck; R S Lord Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Otto Soepenberg; Herlinde Dumez; Jaap Verweij; Floris A de Jong; Maja J A de Jonge; José Thomas; Ferry A L M Eskens; Ron H N van Schaik; Johan Selleslach; Judith Ter Steeg; Patricia Lefebvre; Sylvie Assadourian; Ger-Jan Sanderink; Alex Sparreboom; Allan T van Oosterom Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M Miwa; M Ura; M Nishida; N Sawada; T Ishikawa; K Mori; N Shimma; I Umeda; H Ishitsuka Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Femke M de Man; Andrew K L Goey; Ron H N van Schaik; Ron H J Mathijssen; Sander Bins Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: I Kümler; P Grundtvig Sørensen; J Palshof; E Høgdall; W Skovrider-Ruminski; S Theile; A Fullerton; P G Nielsen; B Vittrup Jensen; D L Nielsen Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Jieru Meng; Mourad Majidi; Bingliang Fang; Lin Ji; B Nebiyou Bekele; John D Minna; Jack A Roth Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 3.240