Literature DB >> 15744540

Survival, complications and outcome in 282 patients operated for neurological deficit due to thoracic or lumbar spinal metastases.

Karl-Ake Jansson1, Henrik C F Bauer.   

Abstract

We present survival, neurological function, and complications in a consecutive series of 282 patients operated for spinal metastases from January 1990 to December 2001. Our main surgical indication throughout this time period was neurological deficit rather than pain. Metastases from cancer of the prostate accounted for 40%, breast 15%, kidney 8%, and lung 7%. In 78% the level of decompression was thoracic and lumbar in 22%. Thirteen percent had a single metastases only, 64% had multiple skeletal metastases, and 23% had non-skeletal metastases also. Preoperatively 64% were non-walkers (Frankel A-C), 30% could walk with aids (Frankel D) and 8% had normal motor function (Frankel E). Posterior decompression and stabilization was applied in 212 patients, 47 had laminectomy only, and 23 had anterior decompressions and reconstruction. Complications were recorded at a level of 20%, and systemic complications were often associated with early death. The survival rate was 0.63 at 3 months, 0.47 at 6 months, 0.30 at 1 year, and 0.16 at 2 years. Twelve of 255 (5%) patients with motor deficits were worsened postoperatively, whereas 179 (70%) improved at least one Frankel grade. The ability to walk postoperatively was retained during follow-up in more than 80% of the patients. This study shows that important improvement of function can be gained by surgical treatment, but the complication rate was high and many patients died of their disease within the first months of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15744540      PMCID: PMC3489401          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0870-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

Review 1.  Emergency treatment of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: an evidence-based guideline.

Authors:  D A Loblaw; N J Laperriere
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Outcome after palliative posterior surgery for metastatic disease of the spine--evaluation of 106 consecutive patients after decompression and stabilisation with the Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

Authors:  J D Rompe; C G Hopf; P Eysel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  8 Gy single fraction radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic skeletal pain: randomised comparison with a multifraction schedule over 12 months of patient follow-up. Bone Pain Trial Working Party.

Authors: 
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study.

Authors:  E Steenland; J W Leer; H van Houwelingen; W J Post; W B van den Hout; J Kievit; H de Haes; H Martijn; B Oei; E Vonk; E van der Steen-Banasik; R G Wiggenraad; J Hoogenhout; C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; G van Tienhoven; R Wanders; J Pomp; M van Reijn; I van Mierlo; E Rutten; J Leer; T van Mierlo
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Surgical strategy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  K Tomita; N Kawahara; T Kobayashi; A Yoshida; H Murakami; T Akamaru
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Cytological diagnosis of skeletal lesions. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy in 110 tumours.

Authors:  R Wedin; H C Bauer; L Skoog; V Söderlund; E Tani
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-07

7.  Posterior decompression and stabilization for spinal metastases. Analysis of sixty-seven consecutive patients.

Authors:  H C Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Complication, survival rates, and risk factors of surgery for metastatic disease of the spine.

Authors:  J J Wise; J S Fischgrund; H N Herkowitz; D Montgomery; L T Kurz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Vertebroplasty for metastasis.

Authors:  Markus Wenger
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Surgery for solitary metastases of the spine: rationale and results of treatment.

Authors:  Narayan Sundaresan; Allen Rothman; Karen Manhart; Kevin Kelliher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Minimally invasive versus conventional spine surgery for vertebral metastases: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Zach Pennington; A Karim Ahmed; Camilo A Molina; Jeffrey Ehresman; Ilya Laufer; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

3.  Risk factors for major complications in surgery for hypervascular spinal tumors: an analysis of 120 cases with adjuvant preoperative embolization.

Authors:  Benqiang Tang; Tao Ji; Xiaodong Tang; Long Jin; Sen Dong; Wei Guo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Answer to the Letter to the Editor of V. Bartanusz concerning "Surgery and survival outcomes of 30 patients with neurological deficit due to clear cell renal cell carcinoma spinal metastases" by Shuai Han, et al. (Eur Spine J, 2015; DOI 10.1007/s00586-015-3912-3).

Authors:  Jianru Xiao; Shuai Han; Ting Wang; Dongjie Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Surgery improves pain, function and quality of life in patients with spinal metastases: a prospective study on 118 patients.

Authors:  Gerald M Y Quan; Jean-Marc Vital; Nicholas Aurouer; Ibrahim Obeid; Jean Palussière; Abou Diallo; Vincent Pointillart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Risk factors for survival of 106 surgically treated patients with symptomatic spinal epidural metastases.

Authors:  L Bollen; G C W de Ruiter; W Pondaag; M P Arts; M Fiocco; T J T Hazen; W C Peul; P D S Dijkstra
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Management of metastatic spinal cord compression: awareness of NICE guidance.

Authors:  F M Brooks; Ameet Ghatahora; M C Brooks; Hazel Warren; Laura Price; Pranter Brahmabhatt; Saik De Vauvert; Cerys John; Elizabeth Farnworth; Erwina Sulaiman; Sashin Ahuja
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-08

8.  The outcome and survival of palliative surgery in thoraco-lumbar spinal metastases: contemporary retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  R M Nemelc; A Stadhouder; B J van Royen; T U Jiya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Andreas Leithner; Roman Radl; Gerald Gruber; Markus Hochegger; Katharina Leithner; Heike Welkerling; Peter Rehak; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  [Surgical management of vertebral column metastatic disease].

Authors:  K-D Schaser; I Melcher; T Mittlmeier; A Schulz; J H Seemann; N P Haas; A C Disch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.