Literature DB >> 15742256

Quality of life in male tracheoesophageal (TE) speakers.

Tanya L Eadie1, Philip C Doyle.   

Abstract

For this study, we determined the quality of life (QOL) in individuals who had undergone total laryngectomy (TL) and who used tracheoesophageal (TE) speech as their primary method of postlaryngectomy communication. We also descriptively compared present QOL outcomes with those found in an extension of the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) Laryngeal Cancer Study. Thirty laryngectomized men with TE speech as their primary mode of communication were recruited for participation in the investigation. Participants completed a general information form as well as the University of Michigan Head and Neck Quality of Life (HNQOL) instrument. Results revealed a high level of self-perceived QOL in the domains of communication, eating, pain, and emotion that was empirically better than results found in a previous study involving individuals who had undergone TL and who were treated in VA hospitals. Possible reasons for the improved self-reported QOL among individuals in the present group include use of TE speech for postlaryngectomy communication, a higher level of education, and membership in a support group. The results suggest to us that these factors should be considered in postlaryngectomy care in the veteran population to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15742256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  8 in total

1.  Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  Kathy F Nagle; Tanya L Eadie
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Prosthetic voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  M S Deshpande
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-11-21

Review 3.  Head and neck cancer pain: systematic review of prevalence and associated factors.

Authors:  Tatiana V Macfarlane; Tanja Wirth; Sriyani Ranasinghe; Kim W Ah-See; Nick Renny; David Hurman
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2012-04-01

4.  Objective and perceptual analysis of outcome of voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy in an Indian tertiary referral cancer centre.

Authors:  B T Varghese; A Mathew; S Sebastian; E M Iype; P Sebastian; B Rajan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-03-23

5.  Relationship between quality of life instruments and phonatory function in tracheoesophageal speech with voice prosthesis.

Authors:  Masayuki Miyoshi; Takahiro Fukuhara; Hideyuki Kataoka; Hiroshi Hagino
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Rachel Kaye; Christopher G Tang; Catherine F Sinclair
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2017-06-21

7.  The relationship between biomechanics of pharyngoesophageal segment and tracheoesophageal phonation.

Authors:  Teng Zhang; Ian Cook; Michał Szczęśniak; Julia Maclean; Peter Wu; Duong Duy Nguyen; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Voice restoration following total laryngectomy by tracheoesophageal prosthesis: effect on patients' quality of life and voice handicap in Jordan.

Authors:  Abdelrahim Y Attieh; Jeff Searl; Nada H Shahaltough; Mahmoud M Wreikat; Donna S Lundy
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.186

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.