Literature DB >> 26266642

Relationship between quality of life instruments and phonatory function in tracheoesophageal speech with voice prosthesis.

Masayuki Miyoshi1,2, Takahiro Fukuhara3, Hideyuki Kataoka3,4, Hiroshi Hagino4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of tracheoesophageal speech with voice prosthesis (T-E speech) after total laryngectomy has increased recently as a method of vocalization following laryngeal cancer. Previous research has not investigated the relationship between quality of life (QOL) and phonatory function in those using T-E speech. This study aimed to demonstrate the relationship between phonatory function and both comprehensive health-related QOL and QOL related to speech in people using T-E speech.
METHODS: The subjects of the study were 20 male patients using T-E speech after total laryngectomy. At a visit to our clinic, the subjects underwent a phonatory function test and completed three questionnaires: the MOS 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8), the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), and the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) Measure.
RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between the physical component summary (PCS), a summary score of SF-8, and VHI-10. Additionally, a significant correlation was observed between the SF-8 mental component summary (MCS) and both VHI-10 and VRQOL. Significant correlations were also observed between voice intensity in the phonatory function test and both VHI-10 and V-RQOL. Finally, voice intensity was significantly correlated with the SF-8 PCS.
CONCLUSIONS: QOL questionnaires and phonatory function tests showed that, in people using T-E speech after total laryngectomy, voice intensity was correlated with comprehensive QOL, including physical and mental health. This finding suggests that voice intensity can be used as a performance index for speech rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MOS 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8); Phonatory function; Speech rehabilitation; Total laryngectomy; Tracheoesophageal speech; Voice prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26266642     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-015-0886-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  22 in total

1.  Prevalence of overlaps between GERD, FD and IBS and impact on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Makiko Kaji; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Masatsugu Shiba; Yukie Kohata; Hirokazu Yamagami; Tetsuya Tanigawa; Kenji Watanabe; Toshio Watanabe; Kazunari Tominaga; Tetsuo Arakawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.029

2.  Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL).

Authors:  N D Hogikyan; G Sethuraman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Correlation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Voice-Related Quality of Life Measure (V-RQOL).

Authors:  Carissa R Portone; Edie R Hapner; Laura McGregor; Kristen Otto; Michael M Johns
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  [Mechanism of neoglottic adjustment for voice variation in tracheoesophageal speech].

Authors:  T Fujimoto; M Kinishi; M Mohri; M Amatsu
Journal:  Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho       Date:  1994-06

5.  Quality of life in male tracheoesophageal (TE) speakers.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Philip C Doyle
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

6.  Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10.

Authors:  Clark A Rosen; Annie S Lee; Jamie Osborne; Thomas Zullo; Thomas Murry
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Evaluation of the quality of life between inpatients and outpatients receiving cancer chemotherapy in Japan.

Authors:  Hidetaka Uramoto; Seiji Kagami; Atsushi Iwashige; Junichi Tsukada
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 8.  Quality-of-life impact of non-neoplastic voice disorders: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; William D Dupont; Mark S Courey
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  New method for in-office secondary voice prosthesis insertion under local anesthesia by reverse puncture from esophageal lumen.

Authors:  Takahiro Fukuhara; Kazunori Fujiwara; Kenichi Nomura; Naritomo Miyake; Hiroya Kitano
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  [Larynx cancer: quality of life and voice after treatment].

Authors:  Vaneli Colombo Rossi; Fernando Laffitte Fernandes; Maria Augusta Aliperti Ferreira; Lucas Ricci Bento; Pablo Soares Gomes Pereira; Carlos Takahiro Chone
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-22
View more
  3 in total

1.  Influence of Collective Esophageal Speech Training on Self-efficacy in Chinese Laryngectomees: A Pretest-posttest Group Study.

Authors:  Qing Chen; Jing Luo; Jun-Ping Li; Dan-Ni Jian; Yong Yuchi; Hong-Xia Ruan; Xiao-Li Huang; Miao Wang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-14

2.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Soon-Hyun Ahn; Hyun Jun Hong; Soon Young Kwon; Kee Hwan Kwon; Jong-Lyel Roh; Junsun Ryu; Jun Hee Park; Seung-Kuk Baek; Guk Haeng Lee; Sei Young Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Man Ki Chung; Young Hoon Joo; Yong Bae Ji; Jeong Hun Hah; Minsu Kwon; Young Min Park; Chang Myeon Song; Sung-Chan Shin; Chang Hwan Ryu; Doh Young Lee; Young Chan Lee; Jae Won Chang; Ha Min Jeong; Jae-Keun Cho; Wonjae Cha; Byung Joon Chun; Ik Joon Choi; Hyo Geun Choi; Kang Dae Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.372

3.  Quality of Life with Voice Prosthesis after Total Laryngectomy.

Authors:  Nicola Massaro; Barbara Verro; Giuseppe Greco; Enzo Chianetta; Aurelio D'Ecclesia; Carmelo Saraniti
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.