Literature DB >> 15741312

Statistical and computational methods for comparative proteomic profiling using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Jennifer Listgarten1, Andrew Emili.   

Abstract

The combined method of LC-MS/MS is increasingly being used to explore differences in the proteomic composition of complex biological systems. The reliability and utility of such comparative protein expression profiling studies is critically dependent on an accurate and rigorous assessment of quantitative changes in the relative abundance of the myriad of proteins typically present in a biological sample such as blood or tissue. In this review, we provide an overview of key statistical and computational issues relevant to bottom-up shotgun global proteomic analysis, with an emphasis on methods that can be applied to improve the dependability of biological inferences drawn from large proteomic datasets. Focusing on a start-to-finish approach, we address the following topics: 1) low-level data processing steps, such as formation of a data matrix, filtering, and baseline subtraction to minimize noise, 2) mid-level processing steps, such as data normalization, alignment in time, peak detection, peak quantification, peak matching, and error models, to facilitate profile comparisons; and, 3) high-level processing steps such as sample classification and biomarker discovery, and related topics such as significance testing, multiple testing, and choice of feature space. We report on approaches that have recently been developed for these steps, discussing their merits and limitations, and propose areas deserving of further research.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15741312     DOI: 10.1074/mcp.R500005-MCP200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  66 in total

1.  Synthetic peptide arrays for pathway-level protein monitoring by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Johannes A Hewel; Jian Liu; Kento Onishi; Vincent Fong; Shamanta Chandran; Jonathan B Olsen; Oxana Pogoutse; Mike Schutkowski; Holger Wenschuh; Dirk F H Winkler; Larry Eckler; Peter W Zandstra; Andrew Emili
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy.

Authors:  Bruno Domon; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Advances in proteomics data analysis and display using an accurate mass and time tag approach.

Authors:  Jennifer S D Zimmer; Matthew E Monroe; Wei-Jun Qian; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 10.946

Review 4.  Predict, prevent and personalize: Genomic and proteomic approaches to cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  Maral Ouzounian; Douglas S Lee; Anthony O Gramolini; Andrew Emili; Masahiro Fukuoka; Peter P Liu
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Chromatographic alignment of LC-MS and LC-MS/MS datasets by genetic algorithm feature extraction.

Authors:  Magnus Palmblad; Davinia J Mills; Laurence V Bindschedler; Rainer Cramer
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Hyungwon Choi; Damian Fermin; Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  A novel comprehensive wave-form MS data processing method.

Authors:  Shuo Chen; Ming Li; Don Hong; Dean Billheimer; Huiming Li; Baogang J Xu; Yu Shyr
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  The new biology: a bridge to clinical cardiology.

Authors:  Ge Louridas; Kg Lourida
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.471

9.  LC-MS Based Detection of Differential Protein Expression.

Authors:  Leepika Tuli; Habtom W Ressom
Journal:  J Proteomics Bioinform       Date:  2009-10-02

Review 10.  Moving forward in colorectal cancer research, what proteomics has to tell.

Authors:  Nerea Bitarte; Eva Bandrés; Ruth Zárate; Natalia Ramirez; Jesus Garcia-Foncillas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.