Literature DB >> 15740432

Inhibitory control and response selection in problem solving: how cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) overcome a bias for selecting the larger quantity of food.

Jerald D Kralik1.   

Abstract

When presented with a choice between 1 and 3 pieces of food in a type of reversed contingency task, 4 cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) consistently chose the 3 pieces of food and received nothing, even though the choice of 1 piece would have yielded 3. However, in a task in which the tamarins received the 1 piece of food when they chose it, all subjects learned to select 1 over 3. Thus, the tamarins' prior failure on the reversed contingency task did not result entirely from an inherent inability to suppress the prepotent response of reaching to the larger of 2 quantities of food. After the experience of selecting the smaller quantity and receiving it, all of the tamarins solved the version of the reversed contingency task that they failed initially. These results suggest that the tamarins' initial failure may have reflected a difficulty with selecting an alternative response option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15740432     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.1.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  11 in total

1.  Social inhibitory control in five lemur species.

Authors:  Rachna B Reddy; Evan L MacLean; Aaron A Sandel; Brian Hare
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Why has evolution not selected for perfect self-control?

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) let lesser rewards pass them by to get better rewards.

Authors:  Jessica L Bramlett; Bonnie M Perdue; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 4.  The evolutionary roots of human decision making.

Authors:  Laurie R Santos; Alexandra G Rosati
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Abstraction promotes creative problem-solving in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  William W L Sampson; Sara A Khan; Eric J Nisenbaum; Jerald D Kralik
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-03-20

6.  Navigating two-dimensional mazes: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and capuchins (Cebus apella sp.) profit from experience differently.

Authors:  Dorothy M Fragaszy; Erica Kennedy; Aeneas Murnane; Charles Menzel; Gene Brewer; Julie Johnson-Pynn; William Hopkins
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the role of magnitude, contiguity, and wholeness.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Chasity L Ratliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-10

8.  Brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus) can master the qualitative version of the reverse-reward contingency.

Authors:  Yannick Glady; Émilie Genty; Jean-Jacques Roeder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A modular mind? A test using individual data from seven primate species.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Bradley Barney; Valen E Johnson; Josep Call; Filippo Aureli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Too good to be true: rhesus monkeys react negatively to better-than-expected offers.

Authors:  Emily J Knight; Kristen M Klepac; Jerald D Kralik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.