Literature DB >> 15738820

Femoral revision with impaction grafting and a collarless, polished, tapered stem.

Craig R Mahoney1, Edward V Fehringer, Branko Kopjar, Kevin L Garvin.   

Abstract

Femoral impaction allografting has been done with and without variations of the original description. The purpose of this study was to review Harris hip scores, radiographs, and complications in patients in whom we used the original technique without significant modifications. Preoperative and postoperative hip scores and radiographic data were available at a mean of 4.7 years for 43 of 44 hips that had femoral component impaction allografting with a collarless, polished, tapered stem. Bone stock was classified according to the Endo-Klinik classification. Survivorship, using femoral reoperation for symptomatic aseptic loosening as the end point, was 97%. The mean Harris hip score improved from 45 to 90 with pain improved in all. Subsidence 4 mm and greater occurred in only two hips, but neither has been revised. One hip was revised for mechanical loosening after a fall on the surgically treated extremity 6 years after surgery. Complications included three intraoperative fractures, one femoral fracture recognized postoperatively, one trochanteric nonunion, and one dislocation. Femoral component revision with impaction allografting and a collarless, polished, tapered stem was reproducible and improved Harris hip scores in patients with aseptic femoral component loosening and bone loss at a mean of 4.7 years after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15738820     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150320.73465.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

Review 1.  [What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].

Authors:  S Gravius; T Randau; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Stability of fused versus nonfused THA femoral impaction grafts.

Authors:  Anneliese D Heiner; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Factors influencing the stability of stems fixed with impaction graft in vitro.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Ohashi; Masanori Matsuura; Tsuneyuki Ebara; Yusaku Okamoto; Hironori Kou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Reduced femoral component subsidence with improved impaction grafting at revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D W Howie; S A Callary; M A McGee; N C Russell; L B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Management of severe femoral bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty--a 236 hip, 6-14-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Guo-Qiang Zhang; Yan Wang; Ji-Ying Chen; Yong-Gang Zhou; Xiu-Tang Cao; Wei Chai; Ming Ni; Xiang Li
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-01

6.  What is the long-term survival of impaction allografting of the femur?

Authors:  Kevin L Garvin; Beau S Konigsberg; Natalie D Ommen; Elizabeth R Lyden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant.

Authors:  Matthias D Wimmer; Thomas M Randau; Moritz C Deml; Rudolf Ascherl; Ulrich Nöth; Raimund Forst; Nadine Gravius; Dieter Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.