Literature DB >> 15737253

Correlation of hallux valgus surgical outcome with AOFAS forefoot score and radiological parameters.

David Thordarson1, Edward Ebramzadeh, Murali Moorthy, Jessica Lee, Sally Rudicel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of three different types of hallux valgus surgeries on patient function using validated questionnaires and to correlate the results with radiographic and physical examinations. This study presents the 2-year followup data of a previous prospective outcome study.
METHODS: One hundred and ninety-six patients were enrolled in this study and completed a baseline AAOS Lower Limb Outcomes Data Collection Questionnaire. They completed the same form at 6, 12, and 24 months after having one of three types of hallux valgus surgeries (106 chevron osteotomies, 72 modified McBride procedures, and 18 modified Lapidus procedures). This questionnaire included the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) as well as questions relating to lower extremity function. Additionally, physicians were asked to complete preoperative and postoperative questionnaires on each patient that included radiographic and physical examination data and the type of surgery done. Completed outcome surveys and radiographic data were available on 196 patients, and physical examination scores were available to assign an AOFAS score in 111 patients at 24-month followup. A one-way comparison was done after stratifying the results for the type of surgery, preoperative hallux valgus angle and 1-2 intermetatarsal angle, postoperative hallux valgus angle and 1-2 intermetatarsal angle, and the change in the angles.
RESULTS: Four of the 10 SF-36 scores (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, and role-emotional) for the combined data improved by more than five points. For the AAOS lower extremity function scores, physical health and pain (68.5 to 81.6), satisfaction with symptoms (1.8 to 3.6), global foot and ankle (77.6 to 93.4), and shoe comfort (29.0 to 58.7) scores all increased significantly. The AOFAS score increased from 52.6 to 85.5 (p <0.001). Surprisingly, when comparing mild-to-moderate to severe deformities preoperatively and postoperatively using the absolute magnitude of the angular change in the hallux valgus or intermetatarsal angles, similar improvement was noted in AOFAS, SF-36, and AAOS lower extremity scores. The magnitude of preoperative deformity, postoperative residual deformity, and magnitude of correction also did not significantly change the amount of improvement in any of these scores. No significant differences were noted in the outcome scores among the three different surgeries.
CONCLUSION: Patients who had hallux valgus surgery had significant improvements in four of their SF-36 scores, four of five of AAOS lower extremity scores, and AOFAS scores. The degree of deformity, amount of correction, or type of operation did not influence outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15737253     DOI: 10.1177/107110070502600202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  19 in total

1.  [Fusion of the first tarsometatarsal joint using a plantar tension band osteosynthesis].

Authors:  M Walther; P Simons; K Nass; A Röser
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Multisegmental foot and ankle motion analysis after hallux valgus surgery.

Authors:  Karl Canseco; Jason Long; Thomas Smedberg; Sergey Tarima; Richard M Marks; Gerald F Harris
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Being overweight has limited effect on SCARF osteotomy outcome for hallux valgus correction.

Authors:  Marcin A Milczarek; Julia J Milczarek; Bartłomiej Tomasik; Przemysław Łaganowski; Krzysztof Nowak; Marcin Domżalski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The effect of hallux valgus open and percutaneous surgery on AOFAS scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Enrique Hernández-Castillejo; Celia Álvarez-Bueno; Miriam Garrido-Miguel; Ana Torres-Costoso; Sara Reina-Gutiérrez; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Percutaneous forefoot surgery for treatment of hallux valgus deformity: an intermediate prospective study.

Authors:  E Crespo Romero; R Peñuela Candel; S Gómez Gómez; A Arias Arias; A Arcas Ordoño; J Gálvez González; R Crespo Romero
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-02-07

6.  Mid-term results of Scarf osteotomy in hallux valgus.

Authors:  Renée A Fuhrmann; Hans Zollinger-Kies; Hans-Peter Kundert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders II: interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association rating scale.

Authors:  Hisateru Niki; Haruhito Aoki; Suguru Inokuchi; Satoru Ozeki; Mitsuo Kinoshita; Hideji Kura; Yasuhito Tanaka; Masahiko Noguchi; Shigeharu Nomura; Masahito Hatori; Shinobu Tatsunami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system.

Authors:  Hisateru Niki; Haruhito Aoki; Suguru Inokuchi; Satoru Ozeki; Mitsuo Kinoshita; Hideji Kura; Yasuhito Tanaka; Masahiko Noguchi; Shigeharu Nomura; Masahito Hatori; Shinobu Tatsunami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Footwear modification following hallux valgus surgery: The all-or-none phenomenon.

Authors:  Cal Robinson; Abhijit Bhosale; Anand Pillai
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2016-06-26

10.  Minimally invasive vs open distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maninder Shah Singh; Ankit Khurana; Darshan Kapoor; Shyam Katekar; Arun Kumar; Gayatri Vishwakarma
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.