Literature DB >> 28210803

Being overweight has limited effect on SCARF osteotomy outcome for hallux valgus correction.

Marcin A Milczarek1, Julia J Milczarek2, Bartłomiej Tomasik3, Przemysław Łaganowski1, Krzysztof Nowak1, Marcin Domżalski4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) and the results of SCARF osteotomy of the first metatarsal for hallux valgus (HV) correction, as the literature on this is scant.
METHODS: This prospective study was carried out between 2011 and 2015. One hundred and thirty-three patients diagnosed with moderate to severe HV underwent a SCARF corrective osteotomy. We divided the patients into two groups according to their BMI: normal and overweight. Postoperative follow-up was two years. All patients were examined twice by two medical doctors simultaneously: pre-operatively and post-operatively at two years' follow-up. Data collected included biometrical records, X-rays [HV angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Index (AOFAS-HMI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction].
RESULTS: There was a significant difference between patient age (p = 0.001), age at onset (p < 0.001) and AOFAS-HMI (p = 0.035) at follow-up. Other parameters were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of BMI, the radiological outcome was comparable. Despite a significant difference in AOFAS-HMI results, pain and satisfaction level were similar. The authors agreed that high BMI has protective role in the prevalence of HV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Hallux valgus; Overweight; SCARF

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28210803     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3419-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  29 in total

1.  The effect of pronation and inclination on the measurement of the hallucal distal metatarsal articular set angle.

Authors:  Gökhan Cakmak; Ulunay Kanatlı; Barış Kılınç; Haluk Yetkin
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.511

2.  Correlation of hallux valgus surgical outcome with AOFAS forefoot score and radiological parameters.

Authors:  David Thordarson; Edward Ebramzadeh; Murali Moorthy; Jessica Lee; Sally Rudicel
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Effect of Obesity on Outcome of Hallux Valgus Surgery.

Authors:  Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Merrill Jian Hui Lee; Kiran Rikhraj; Simran Parmar; Hwei Chi Chong; Andy Khye Soon Yew; Kevin Oon Thien Koo; Inderjeet Singh Rikhraj
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Factors associated with hallux valgus in a community-based cross-sectional study of adults with and without osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yvonne M Golightly; Marian T Hannan; Alyssa B Dufour; Jordan B Renner; Joanne M Jordan
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Comparison of radiographic and anatomic distal metatarsal articular angle in cadaver feet.

Authors:  James R Jastifer; Michael J Coughlin; Shane Schutt; Christopher Hirose; Michael Kennedy; Brett Grebing; Bertil Smith; Truitt Cooper; Pau Golano; Ramon Viladot; Jesse F Doty
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Effect of Obesity on Outcomes of Forefoot Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew S Stewart; Clayton C Bettin; Matthew T Ramsey; Susan N Ishikawa; G Andrew Murphy; David R Richardson; Elizabeth A Tolley
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 7.  Obesity related complications in surgery.

Authors:  Shawn M Stevens; Brendan P O'Connell; Ted A Meyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment.

Authors:  Michael J Coughlin; Caroll P Jones
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  The impact of obesity on complications of elbow, forearm, and hand surgeries.

Authors:  Daniel A London; Jeffrey G Stepan; Gopal R Lalchandani; Ugochi C Okoroafor; Troy S Wildes; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  A geometric analysis of hallux valgus: correlation with clinical assessment of severity.

Authors:  Carlos Piqué-Vidal; Joan Vila
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  4 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus: a systematic review of current surgical techniques.

Authors:  Francesc Malagelada; Cyrus Sahirad; Miki Dalmau-Pastor; Jordi Vega; Rej Bhumbra; Maria Cristina Manzanares-Céspedes; Olivier Laffenêtre
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Percutaneous minimally invasive Akin osteotomy in hallux valgus interphalangeus: a case series.

Authors:  Gerhard Kaufmann; Martin Handle; Michael Liebensteiner; Matthias Braito; Dietmar Dammerer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The impact of body mass index on metatarsalgia surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel Pérez-Prieto; Marta Cuenca; Raquel Marí; Raquel Martínez; Gemma González; Alberto Ginés
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Effectiveness of hallux valgus surgery on patient quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Enrique Hernández-Castillejo; Vicente Martínez Vizcaíno; Miriam Garrido-Miguel; Iván Cavero-Redondo; Diana P Pozuelo-Carrascosa; Celia Álvarez-Bueno
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.