E Crespo Romero1, R Peñuela Candel2, S Gómez Gómez2, A Arias Arias3, A Arcas Ordoño2, J Gálvez González2, R Crespo Romero2. 1. Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, Hospital Mancha-Centro, Avenida de la Constitución s/n, Alcázar de San Juan, CP: 13600, Ciudad Real, Spain. ecresporomero@gmail.com. 2. Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, Hospital Mancha-Centro, Avenida de la Constitución s/n, Alcázar de San Juan, CP: 13600, Ciudad Real, Spain. 3. Research Support Unit, Hospital Mancha-Centro, Avenida de la Constitución s/n, Alcázar de San Juan, CP: 13600, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aims to illustrate the results of percutaneous forefoot surgery (PFS) for correction of hallux valgus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 108 patients, with hallux valgus deformity, who underwent PFS was conducted. The minimum clinical and radiological follow-up was two years (mean 57.3 months, range 22-112). RESULTS: Preoperative mean visual analog scale was 6.3 ± 1.5 points, and AOFAS scores were 50.6 ± 11 points. At the last follow-up, both scores improved to 1.9 ± 2.4 points and 85.9 ± 1.83 points, respectively. Mean hallux valgus angle changed from 34.3° ± 9.3° preoperatively to 22.5° ± 11.1° at follow-up. At follow-up, 76.5% of the subjects were satisfied or very satisfied. Recurrence of medial 1st MT head pain happened in 22 cases (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: PFS, in our study, does not improve the radiological and patient satisfaction rate results compared with conventional procedures. The main advantage is a low postoperative pain level, but with an insufficient HVA correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective study.
BACKGROUND: This study aims to illustrate the results of percutaneous forefoot surgery (PFS) for correction of hallux valgus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 108 patients, with hallux valgus deformity, who underwent PFS was conducted. The minimum clinical and radiological follow-up was two years (mean 57.3 months, range 22-112). RESULTS: Preoperative mean visual analog scale was 6.3 ± 1.5 points, and AOFAS scores were 50.6 ± 11 points. At the last follow-up, both scores improved to 1.9 ± 2.4 points and 85.9 ± 1.83 points, respectively. Mean hallux valgus angle changed from 34.3° ± 9.3° preoperatively to 22.5° ± 11.1° at follow-up. At follow-up, 76.5% of the subjects were satisfied or very satisfied. Recurrence of medial 1st MT head pain happened in 22 cases (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: PFS, in our study, does not improve the radiological and patient satisfaction rate results compared with conventional procedures. The main advantage is a low postoperative pain level, but with an insufficient HVA correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective study.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hallux valgus deformity; Minimally invasive surgery; Percutaneous surgery