Literature DB >> 15735115

Site of primary tumor has a prognostic role in operable breast cancer: the international breast cancer study group experience.

Marco Colleoni1, David Zahrieh, Richard D Gelber, Stig B Holmberg, Jan E Mattsson, Carl-Magnus Rudenstam, Jurij Lindtner, Darja Erzen, Raymond Snyder, John Collins, Martin F Fey, Beat Thürlimann, Diana Crivellari, Elizabeth Murray, Caesar Mendiola, Olivia Pagani, Monica Castiglione-Gertsch, Alan S Coates, Karen Price, Aron Goldhirsch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer presenting at the medial site of the breast may have a worse prognosis compared with tumors located in external quadrants. For medial tumors, axillary lymph node staging may not accurately reflect the metastatic potential of the disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight-thousand four-hundred twenty-two patients randomly assigned to International Breast Cancer Study Group clinical trials between 1978 and 1999 were classified as medial site (1,622; 19%) or lateral, central, and other sites (6,800; 81%). Median follow-up was 11 years.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was observed for patients with medial tumors versus those with nonmedial tumors in disease-free survival (DFS; 10-year DFS, 46% v 48%; HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.18; P = .01) and overall survival (10-year OS 59% v 61%; HR, 1.09; 1.01 to 1.19; P = .04). This difference increased after adjustment for other prognostic factors (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.32 for DFS; and HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.35 for OS; both P = .0001). The risk of relapse for patients with medial presentation was largest for the node-negative cohort and for patients with tumors larger than 2 cm. In the subgroup of 2,931 patients with negative axillary lymph nodes, 10-year DFS was 61% v 67%, and OS was 73% v 80% for medial versus nonmedial sites, respectively (HR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.54; P = .0001 for DFS; and HR 1.40; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.67; P = .0003 for OS).
CONCLUSION: Tumor site has a significant prognostic utility, especially for axillary lymph node-negative disease, that should be considered in therapeutic algorithms. New staging procedures such as biopsy of the sentinel internal mammary nodes or novel imaging methods should be further studied in patients with medial tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15735115     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  21 in total

1.  Impact of internal mammary lymph node drainage identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy on outcomes in patients with stage I to III breast cancer.

Authors:  Amanda L Kong; Welela Tereffe; Kelly K Hunt; Min Yi; Taewoo Kang; Kimberly Weatherspoon; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Isabelle Bedrosian; Rosa F Hwang; Gildy V Babiera; Thomas A Buchholz; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Association between body mass index and localization of breast cancer: results from a nationwide inpatient database in Japan.

Authors:  Takaaki Konishi; Michimasa Fujiogi; Nobuaki Michihata; Kojiro Morita; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Masahiko Tanabe; Yasuyuki Seto; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Are there patients with T1 to T2, lymph node-negative breast cancer who are "high-risk" for locoregional disease recurrence?

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Sujata Patil; Michelle M Stempel; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Prognostic significance of the primary tumor site and immune indexes in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Xinming Song; Jianli Ma; Han Zhang; Qingyuan Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

Review 5.  Role of FDG PET-CT in evaluation of locoregional nodal disease for initial staging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yiyan Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

6.  Clinically apparent internal mammary nodal metastasis in patients with advanced breast cancer: incidence and local control.

Authors:  Yu-Jing Zhang; Julia L Oh; Gary J Whitman; Puneeth Iyengar; Tse-Kuan Yu; Welela Tereffe; Wendy A Woodward; George Perkins; Thomas A Buchholz; Eric A Strom
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Evolutionary history of metastatic breast cancer reveals minimal seeding from axillary lymph nodes.

Authors:  Ikram Ullah; Govindasamy-Muralidharan Karthik; Amjad Alkodsi; Una Kjällquist; Gustav Stålhammar; John Lövrot; Nelson-Fuentes Martinez; Jens Lagergren; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Johan Hartman; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Location of triple-negative breast cancers: comparison with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers on MR imaging.

Authors:  Won Hwa Kim; Wonshik Han; Jung Min Chang; Nariya Cho; In Ae Park; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do breast quadrants explain racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes?

Authors:  Yunan Han; Justin Xavier Moore; Marvin Langston; Lindsay Fuzzell; Saira Khan; Marquita W Lewis; Graham A Colditz; Ying Liu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Survival analysis of 1148 women diagnosed with breast cancer in Southern Iran.

Authors:  Abbas Rezaianzadeh; Janet Peacock; Daniel Reidpath; Abdolrasoul Talei; Seyed Vahid Hosseini; Davood Mehrabani
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.