PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence and local control of internal mammary lymph node metastases (IMN+) in patients with clinical N2 or N3 locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 809 breast cancer patients diagnosed with advanced nodal disease (clinical N2-3) who received radiation treatment at our institution from January 2000 December 2006. Patients were considered IMN+ on the basis of imaging studies. RESULTS: We identified 112 of 809 patients who presented with IMN+ disease (13.8%) detected on ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. All 112 patients with IMN+ disease received anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) resulted in a complete response (CR) on imaging studies of IMN disease in 72.1% of patients. Excluding 16 patients with progressive disease, 96 patients received adjuvant radiation to the breast or the chest wall and the regional lymphatics including the IMN chain with a median dose of 60 Gy if the internal mammary lymph nodes normalized after chemotherapy and 66 Gy if they did not. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 41 months (8-118 months). For the 96 patients able to complete curative therapy, the actuarial 5-year IMN control rate, locoregional control, overall survival, and disease-free survival were 89%, 80%, 76%, and 56%. CONCLUSION: Over ten percent of patients with advanced nodal disease will have IMN metastases on imaging studies. Multimodality therapy including IMN irradiation achieves excellent rates of control in the IMN region and a DFS of more than 50% after curative treatment. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence and local control of internal mammary lymph node metastases (IMN+) in patients with clinical N2 or N3 locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 809 breast cancerpatients diagnosed with advanced nodal disease (clinical N2-3) who received radiation treatment at our institution from January 2000 December 2006. Patients were considered IMN+ on the basis of imaging studies. RESULTS: We identified 112 of 809 patients who presented with IMN+ disease (13.8%) detected on ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. All 112 patients with IMN+ disease received anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) resulted in a complete response (CR) on imaging studies of IMN disease in 72.1% of patients. Excluding 16 patients with progressive disease, 96 patients received adjuvant radiation to the breast or the chest wall and the regional lymphatics including the IMN chain with a median dose of 60 Gy if the internal mammary lymph nodes normalized after chemotherapy and 66 Gy if they did not. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 41 months (8-118 months). For the 96 patients able to complete curative therapy, the actuarial 5-year IMN control rate, locoregional control, overall survival, and disease-free survival were 89%, 80%, 76%, and 56%. CONCLUSION: Over ten percent of patients with advanced nodal disease will have IMNmetastases on imaging studies. Multimodality therapy including IMN irradiation achieves excellent rates of control in the IMN region and a DFS of more than 50% after curative treatment. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: H Struikmans; L J E E Scheijmans; A van Dalen; M Harmelink; P Westers; J W van Isselt Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: G M Freedman; B L Fowble; N Nicolaou; E R Sigurdson; M H Torosian; M C Boraas; J P Hoffman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J Lacour; P Bucalossi; E Cacers; G Jacobelli; T Koszarowski; M Le; C Rumeau-Rouquette; U Veronesi Journal: Cancer Date: 1976-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Julia White; Jennifer Moughan; Lori J Pierce; Monica Morrow; Jean Owen; J Frank Wilson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: S Eva Singletary; Craig Allred; Pandora Ashley; Lawrence W Bassett; Donald Berry; Kirby I Bland; Patrick I Borgen; Gary Clark; Stephen B Edge; Daniel F Hayes; Lorie L Hughes; Robert V P Hutter; Monica Morrow; David L Page; Abram Recht; Richard L Theriault; Ann Thor; Donald L Weaver; H Samuel Wieand; Frederick L Greene Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anne E Saarnak; Coen W Hurkmans; Bradley R Pieters; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Leo J Schultze Kool; Augustinus A M Hart; Sara H Muller Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Savitri Krishnamurthy; Therese Bevers; Henry M Kuerer; Benjamin Smith; Wei Tse Yang Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Maxine S Jochelson; Lizza Lebron; Stefanie S Jacobs; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Simon N Powell; Virgilio Sacchini; Gary A Ulaner; Elizabeth A Morris; D David Dershaw Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Puneeth Iyengar; Eric A Strom; Yu-Jing Zhang; Gary J Whitman; Benjamin D Smith; Wendy A Woodward; Tse-Kuan Yu; Thomas A Buchholz Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-09-14
Authors: Sandeep Bhoriwal; S V S Deo; Rakesh Kumar; Sanjay Thulkar; Ajay Gogia; D N Sharma; Sandeep Mathur Journal: Indian J Surg Oncol Date: 2021-03-02