Literature DB >> 22648744

Impact of internal mammary lymph node drainage identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy on outcomes in patients with stage I to III breast cancer.

Amanda L Kong1, Welela Tereffe, Kelly K Hunt, Min Yi, Taewoo Kang, Kimberly Weatherspoon, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Isabelle Bedrosian, Rosa F Hwang, Gildy V Babiera, Thomas A Buchholz, Funda Meric-Bernstam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Involvement of internal mammary (IM) lymph nodes is associated with a poor prognosis for patients with breast cancer. This study examined the effect of drainage to IM nodes identified by lymphoscintigraphy on oncologic outcomes.
METHODS: A prospectively maintained breast cancer patient database at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center was used to identify patients with stage I to III breast cancer who underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with peritumoral injection of colloid and intraoperative lymphatic mapping from 1996 to 2005. Medical records were reviewed of 1772 patients who had drainage to any lymph node basin on lymphoscintigraphy but who did not undergo IM nodal biopsy. Patients with IM drainage, with or without axillary drainage, were compared with patients without IM drainage. Local-regional recurrence, distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival were evaluated.
RESULTS: We identified IM drainage in 334 patients (18.8%). Patients with IM drainage were significantly younger, less likely to have upper outer quadrant tumors, and more likely to have smaller and medial tumors than patients without IM drainage. Rates of IM irradiation did not differ between the 2 groups. The median follow-up time was 7.4 years. On multivariate analysis, IM drainage was significantly associated with a worse DDFS (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.6; P = .04) but not local-regional recurrence or overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: IM drainage on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was found to be significantly associated with worse DDFS. Further study is needed to determine the role of lymphoscintigraphy in the personalization of breast cancer staging and therapy.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22648744      PMCID: PMC3913471          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  37 in total

1.  Internal mammary lymph nodes: to treat or not to treat.

Authors:  T A Buchholz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Comprehensive review of the management of internal mammary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  N Klauber-DeMore; J L Bevilacqua; K J Van Zee; P Borgen; H S Cody
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Sentinel node biopsy and internal mammary lymphatic mapping in breast cancer.

Authors:  N Johnson; L Soot; J Nelson; M D Franzini; H Vea; S Gruner; L Kulawiak; K Young
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The dissection of internal mammary nodes does not improve the survival of breast cancer patients. 30-year results of a randomised trial.

Authors:  U Veronesi; E Marubini; L Mariani; P Valagussa; R Zucali
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  Should internal mammary lymph nodes in breast cancer be a target for the radiation oncologist?

Authors:  G M Freedman; B L Fowble; N Nicolaou; E R Sigurdson; M H Torosian; M C Boraas; J P Hoffman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Lymphatic mapping of the breast: locating the sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  R F Uren; R Howman-Giles; S B Renwick; D Gillett
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-05-14       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Should internal mammary nodes be sampled in the sentinel lymph node era?

Authors:  S L Sugg; D J Ferguson; M C Posner; R Heimann
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Halsted revisited: internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

Authors:  F W van der Ent; R A Kengen; H A van der Pol; J A Povel; H J Stroeken; A G Hoofwijk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  P L Fitzgibbons; D L Page; D Weaver; A D Thor; D C Allred; G M Clark; S G Ruby; F O'Malley; J F Simpson; J L Connolly; D F Hayes; S B Edge; A Lichter; S J Schnitt
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  The influence of untreated internal mammary metastases upon the course of mammary cancer.

Authors:  W L Donegan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Internal mammary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: what should radiologists know?

Authors:  Misugi Urano; Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah Denewar; Taro Murai; Masaru Mizutani; Masanori Kitase; Kazuya Ohashi; Norio Shiraki; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Unintended irradiation of internal mammary chain - Is that enough?

Authors:  Lucas Gomes Sapienza; Michael Jenwei Chen; Maria José Leite Gomes; David B Mansur
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-08-11

3.  Are there patients with T1 to T2, lymph node-negative breast cancer who are "high-risk" for locoregional disease recurrence?

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Sujata Patil; Michelle M Stempel; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Do Internal Mammary Nodes Matter?

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Incidental Internal Mammary Nodes during Recipient Vessel Dissection in Breast Reconstruction: Are They Significant?

Authors:  Aaron L Grant; Kristina H Lutz; Claire F Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-01-08

6.  Operable breast cancer of the inner hemisphere is associated with poor survival.

Authors:  Cong Xue; Rou Jun Peng; Shu Sen Wang; Yan Xia Shi; Xin An; Fei Xu; Zhong Yu Yuan
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  To Evaluate the Role of Positron Emission Tomography-Computerized Tomography in Initial Staging of Carcinoma Breast.

Authors:  Anju Kansal; Gaurav Jaswal; Shreya Garg; Manraj Singh Kang; Hanuman Prasad Yadav; Raja Paramjeet Singh Banipal; Pardeep Garg; Taranjeet Kaur
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

8.  Incidence and Potential Significance of Internal Mammary Lymphadenopathy on Computed Tomography in Patients with a Diagnosis of Primary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah L Savaridas; Jonathan D Spratt; Julie Cox
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2015-08-04

9.  The effect of laterality and primary tumor site on cancer-specific mortality in breast cancer: a SEER population-based study.

Authors:  Jing Bao; Ke-Da Yu; Yi-Zhou Jiang; Zhi-Ming Shao; Gen-Hong Di
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.