Literature DB >> 15734266

Accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in the measurement of three-dimensional micromotion in a fracture model of the distal radius.

Rami Madanat1, Tatu J Mäkinen, Niko Moritz, Kimmo T Mattila, Hannu T Aro.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to verify the feasibility of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in monitoring three-dimensional fracture micromotion in fractures of the distal radius. The experimental set-up consisted of a simulated model of an extra-articular Colles' fracture, including metallic beads inserted into the bone on either side of the fracture site. The model was rigidly fixed to high precision micrometer stages allowing controlled translation in three axes and rotation about the longitudinal and transverse axes. The whole construct was placed inside a RSA calibration cage with two perpendicular radiographic film cassettes. Accuracy was calculated as the 95% prediction intervals from the regression analyses between the micromotion measured by RSA and actual displacements measured by micrometers. Precision was determined as the standard deviation of five repeated measurements of a 200 microm displacement or a 0.5 degrees rotation along a specific axis. Translations from 25 microm to 5mm were measured with an accuracy of +/-6 microm and translations of 200 microm were measured with a precision of 2-6 microm. Rotations ranging from 1/6 degrees to 2 degrees were measured with an accuracy of +/-0.073 degrees and rotations of 1/2 degrees were measured with a precision of 0.025 degrees -0.096 degrees . The number of markers and their configuration had greater impact on the accuracy and precision of rotation than on those of translation. Aside from the unknown rate of clinical marker loosening, the current results favor the use of at least four markers in each bone fragment in distal radius fractures. These results suggest a strong rationale for the use of RSA as an objective tool for comparing different treatment modalities and novel bone graft substitutes aimed at stabilization of fractures of the distal radius.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734266     DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  8 in total

1.  Precision and accuracy measurement of radiostereometric analysis applied to movement of the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Thomas J Kibsgård; Olav Røise; Britt Stuge; Stephan M Röhrl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Is Model-based Radiostereometric Analysis Suitable for Clinical Trials of a Cementless Tapered Wedge Femoral Stem?

Authors:  Sanaz Nazari-Farsani; Sami Finnilä; Niko Moritz; Kimmo Mattila; Jessica J Alm; Hannu T Aro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Differentially loaded radiostereometric analysis to monitor fracture stiffness: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Mellick J Chehade; Lucian B Solomon; Stuart A Callary; Sam H Benveniste; Anthony P Pohl; Donald W Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in monitoring tibial plateau fractures.

Authors:  Lucian B Solomon; Aaron W Stevenson; Stuart A Callary; Thomas R Sullivan; Donald W Howie; Mellick J Chehade
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Collecting a comprehensive evidence base to monitor fracture rehabilitation: A case study.

Authors:  Stuart A Callary; Dominic Thewlis; Alex V Rowlands; David M Findlay; Lucian B Solomon
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

6.  Precise and feasible measurements of lateral calcaneal lengthening osteotomies by radiostereometric analysis in cadaver feet.

Authors:  P Martinkevich; O Rahbek; B Møller-Madsen; K Søballe; M Stilling
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Image intensifier distortion correction for fluoroscopic RSA: the need for independent accuracy assessment.

Authors:  Angela E Kedgley; Anne-Marie V Fox; Thomas R Jenkyn
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Future modalities to assess fracture healing.

Authors:  Christopher Lee; Jonathan Copp
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2022-03-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.