Literature DB >> 15734172

Application of the standard addition approach for the quantification of urinary benzene.

Pascale Basilicata1, Nadia Miraglia, Maria Pieri, Antonio Acampora, Leonardo Soleo, Nicola Sannolo.   

Abstract

Urinary benzene is used as biomarker of exposure to evaluate the uptake of this solvent both in non-occupationally exposed population and in benzene-exposed workers. The quantitative determination of benzene in urine is carried out in a three steps procedure: urine collection, sample analysis by head space/solid phase microextraction/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and analyte quantification. The adopted quantification method influences the initial step, hence the whole procedure. Two quantification approaches were compared as regards precision and accuracy: the calibration curves and the standard addition method. Even if calibration curves obtained by using urine samples from different subjects were always linear, their slopes and intercepts showed noteworthy variations, attributable to the influence of the biological matrix on benzene recovery. The standard addition method showed to be more suitable for compensating matrix effects, and a three-point standard addition protocol was used to quantify benzene in urine samples of 11 benzene-exposed workers (smokers and non-smokers). Urine from occupationally exposed workers was collected before and after work-shift. Besides urinary benzene, the applicability of the method was verified by measuring the urinary concentration of the S-phenylmercapturic acid, a specific benzene metabolite, generally adopted as biomarker in biological monitoring procedures. A similar trend of concentration levels of both analytes measured in urine samples collected before work-shift with respect to the after work-shift ones was found, showing the actual applicability of the standard addition method for biological monitoring purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734172     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of matrix effect and chromatography efficiency: new parameters for validation of method development.

Authors:  Eduard Rogatsky; Daniel Stein
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Evaluation of urinary biomarkers of exposure to benzene: correlation with blood benzene and influence of confounding factors.

Authors:  Perrine Hoet; Erika De Smedt; Massimo Ferrari; Marcello Imbriani; Luciano Maestri; Sara Negri; Peter De Wilde; Dominique Lison; Vincent Haufroid
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Overcoming the effects of matrix interference in the measurement of urine protein analytes.

Authors:  Timothy P Taylor; Michael G Janech; Elizabeth H Slate; Evelyn C Lewis; John M Arthur; Jim C Oates
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2012-02-01

4.  Diquat Poisoning: Care Management and Medico-Legal Implications.

Authors:  Pascale Basilicata; Maria Pieri; Angela Simonelli; Emanuele Capasso; Claudia Casella; Tina Noto; Fabio Policino; Pierpaolo Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-03-30

5.  Steam distillation/drop-by-drop extraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for fast determination of volatile components in jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) extract.

Authors:  Shi-Hao Sun; Guo-Bi Chai; Peng Li; Jian-Ping Xie; Yue Su
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.215

6.  Urinary Trans, Trans-Muconic Acid is Not a Reliable Biomarker for Low-level Environmental and Occupational Benzene Exposures.

Authors:  Amir Jalai; Zahra Ramezani; Karim Ebrahim
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2016-10-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.