Literature DB >> 15733040

Low-dose binary behavior of bystander cell killing after microbeam irradiation of a single cell with focused c(k) x rays.

Giuseppe Schettino1, Melvyn Folkard, Barry D Michael, Kevin M Prise.   

Abstract

Although conclusive evidence has been obtained for the presence of radiation-induced bystander effects, the mechanisms that trigger and regulate these processes are still largely unknown. The bystander effect may play a critical role in determining the biological effectiveness of low-dose exposures, but questions on how to incorporate it into current models and extrapolate the risks of radiation-induced carcinogenesis are still open. The Gray Cancer Institute soft X-ray microbeam has been used to investigate the dose-response relationship of the bystander effect below 0.5 Gy. The survival response of V79 cells was assessed after the irradiation of a single cell within a population with a submicrometer-size beam of carbon K X rays (278 eV). Above 0.3 Gy, the measured bystander cell killing was in agreement with previously published data; however, a significant increase in the scatter of the data was observed in the low-dose region (<0.3 Gy). The data distribution observed indicates a binary behavior for triggering of the bystander response. According to our hypothesis, the probability of triggering a bystander response increases approximately linearly with the dose delivered to the single selected cell, reaching 100% above about 0.3 Gy. The magnitude of the bystander effect, when triggered, is approximately constant with the dose and results in an overall approximately 10% reduction in survival in our system. This suggests that the event that triggers the emission of the bystander signal by the hit cell is an all-or-nothing process. Extrapolation of the data indicates that when a single fast electron traverses a V79 cell, there is a probability of approximately 0.3% that the cell will emit the bystander signal. The data presented in this paper have also been analyzed statistically to test the possibility that complex DNA double-strand breaks may be the initial critical event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15733040     DOI: 10.1667/rr3319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  24 in total

1.  MCNP5 evaluation of dose dissipation in tissue-like media exposed to low-energy monoenergetic X-ray microbeam.

Authors:  Shaun D Clarke; Tatjana Jevremovic
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Biological effects in unirradiated human tissue induced by radiation damage up to 1 mm away.

Authors:  Oleg V Belyakov; Stephen A Mitchell; Deep Parikh; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Stephen A Marino; Sally A Amundson; Charles R Geard; David J Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Demonstration of a radiation-induced bystander effect for low dose low LET beta-particles.

Authors:  Rudranath Persaud; Hongning Zhou; Tom K Hei; Eric J Hall
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Monte carlo simulations of dose from microCT imaging procedures in a realistic mouse phantom.

Authors:  Richard Taschereau; Patrick L Chow; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Effect of site-specific bronchial radon progeny deposition on the spatial and temporal distributions of cellular responses.

Authors:  Arpád Farkas; Werner Hofmann; Imre Balásházy; István Szoke; Balázs G Madas; Mona Moustafa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Low-radiation environment affects the development of protection mechanisms in V79 cells.

Authors:  E Fratini; C Carbone; D Capece; G Esposito; G Simone; M A Tabocchini; M Tomasi; M Belli; L Satta
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Alternative medicine techniques have non-linear effects on radiation response and can alter the expression of radiation induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Richard Smith; Matthew Henry; Colin Seymour; Raimond Wong
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Uncomfortable issues in radiation protection posed by low-dose radiobiology.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.