Literature DB >> 15731350

The time course and specificity of perceptual deterioration.

Sara C Mednick1, A Cyrus Arman, Geoffrey M Boynton.   

Abstract

Repeated within-day testing on a texture discrimination task leads to retinotopically specific decreases in performance. Although perceptual learning has been shown to be highly specific to the retinotopic location and characteristics of the trained stimulus, the specificity of perceptual deterioration has not been studied. We investigated the similarities between learning and deterioration by examining whether deterioration transfers to new distractor or target orientations or to the untrained eye. Participants performed a texture discrimination task in three one-hour sessions. We tested the specificity of deterioration in the final session by switching either the orientation of the background or the target elements by 90 degrees. We found that performance deteriorated steadily both within and across the first two sessions and was specific to the target but not the distractor orientation. In a separate experiment, we found that deterioration transferred to the untrained eye. Changes in performance were independent of reported sleepiness and awareness of stimulus changes, arguing against the possibility that perceptual deterioration is due to general fatigue. Rather, we hypothesize that perceptual deterioration may be caused by changes in the ability for attention to selectively enhance the responses of relatively low-level orientation-selective sensory neurons, possibly within the primary visual cortex. Further, the differences in specificity profiles between learning and deterioration suggest separate underlying mechanisms that occur within the same cortical area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15731350      PMCID: PMC553291          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407866102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

1.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  S P Gandhi; D J Heeger; G M Boynton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Three remarks on perceptual learning.

Authors:  J D Mollon; M V Danilova
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1996

3.  Interocular transfer in perceptual learning of a pop-out discrimination task.

Authors:  A A Schoups; G A Orban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Simultaneous learning of motion discrimination in two directions.

Authors:  Z Liu; L M Vaina
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1998-04

5.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Velocity-dependent improvements in single-dot direction discrimination.

Authors:  N Matthews; L Welch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-01

7.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention.

Authors:  A Martínez; L Anllo-Vento; M I Sereno; L R Frank; R B Buxton; D J Dubowitz; E C Wong; H Hinrichs; H J Heinze; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Perceptual learning in vernier acuity: what is learned?

Authors:  J Saarinen; D M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  D C Somers; A M Dale; A E Seiffert; R B Tootell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Alteration of digital representations in somatosensory cortex in focal hand dystonia.

Authors:  T Elbert; V Candia; E Altenmüller; H Rau; A Sterr; B Rockstroh; C Pantev; E Taub
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-11-16       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  33 in total

1.  Further support for the importance of the suppressive signal (pull) during the push-pull perceptual training.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  REM, not incubation, improves creativity by priming associative networks.

Authors:  Denise J Cai; Sarnoff A Mednick; Elizabeth M Harrison; Jennifer C Kanady; Sara C Mednick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Generalization of perceptual and motor learning: a causal link with memory encoding and consolidation?

Authors:  N Censor
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  When more equals less: overtraining inhibits perceptual learning owing to lack of wakeful consolidation.

Authors:  Soren Ashley; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Perceptual deterioration is reflected in the neural response: fMRI study of nappers and non-nappers.

Authors:  Sara C Mednick; Sean P A Drummond; A Cyrus Arman; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Sleep improves the variability of motor performance.

Authors:  Sean Hill; Giulio Tononi; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  REM sleep rescues learning from interference.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McDevitt; Katherine A Duggan; Sara C Mednick
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Sleep after practice reduces the attentional blink.

Authors:  Nicola Cellini; Patrick T Goodbourn; Elizabeth A McDevitt; Paolo Martini; Alex O Holcombe; Sara C Mednick
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Differential rates of consolidation of conceptual and stimulus learning following training on an auditory skill.

Authors:  Jeanette A Ortiz; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Common mechanisms of human perceptual and motor learning.

Authors:  Nitzan Censor; Dov Sagi; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.