Literature DB >> 18810104

Electrical stimulation as a strength improvement technique: a review.

J F Kramer, S W Mendryk.   

Abstract

The dominant philosophy within rehabilitation has been that electrical stimulation is a valuable kinesthetic muscle reeducation technique, but voluntary exercise is of greater benefit in restoring voluntary muscular control and improving the strength of injured muscle. Much publicized Soviet research has suggested that this preference for voluntary exercise may be inappropriate and that electrical stimulation is the technique of choice for strengthening normally innervated muscle. This position has not been supported by the limited non-Soviet research. Whether this lack of support is attributable to an inability to duplicate the Soviet current format and/or application technique, or simply that electrical stimulation programs are not more effective than voluntary exercise programs, is presently unknown. To date, neither the voluntary exercise philosophy nor the nonvoluntary exercise (electrical stimulation) philosophy has overwhelming scientific support. Electrical stimulation programs must be compared with traditional voluntary exercise programs before practitioners are in a position to confidently accept or to refute either method. Until an adequate number of research studies have been conducted, practitioners cannot meet their obligation to know what the most effective strength improvement techniques are and to make such treatment available.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1982;4(2):91-98.

Year:  1982        PMID: 18810104     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1982.4.2.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary exercise.

Authors:  K Hainaut; J Duchateau
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Leon Bax; Filip Staes; Arianne Verhagen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes?

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Patrick J Cozzone; David Bendahan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Muscle strength and its development. New perspectives.

Authors:  R M Enoka
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Effect of patterned electrical neuromuscular stimulation on vertical jump in collegiate athletes.

Authors:  Dawn T Gulick; John C Castel; Francis X Palermo; David O Draper
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF MEDIUM AND LOW FREQUENCY ON THE QUADRICEPS FEMORIS.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Pinfildi; Rodrigo Antonio Carvalho Andraus; Ligia Megumi Iida; Rodrigo Paschoal Prado
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  Lab-based feasibility and acceptability of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in hip osteoarthritis rehabilitation.

Authors:  Louise C Burgess; Paul Taylor; Thomas W Wainwright; Ian D Swain
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 8.  Adherence to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Interventions for Muscle Impairment in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Louise C Burgess; Paul Taylor; Thomas W Wainwright; Shayan Bahadori; Ian D Swain
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.