Literature DB >> 15729558

Impact of tumor size on the long-term survival of patients with early stage renal cell cancer.

M Kuczyk1, G Wegener, A S Merseburger, A Anastasiadis, S Machtens, A Zumbrägel, J T Hartmann, C Bokemeyer, Udo Jonas, A Stenzl.   

Abstract

As the biological behaviour of even early stage renal cell cancer (RCC) strongly correlates with tumor size, it has been argued that the inclusion of RCC up to a maximum diameter of 7 cm into a common subgroup classified as T1 according to the 5th edition of the TNM system would not adequately represent the different biological aggressiveness of these malignancies. Taking this into account, the TNM classification, which now categorizes T1 RCC as T1a and T1b according to a cutoff size of 4 cm, was recently modified. However, only a few larger investigations, mainly based on univariate statistical analyses, that support the suitability of this cutoff are at present available from the literature. Therefore, it was the aim of the present investigation to determine the tumor size that best separates patients with low responses from those with high risk for tumor progression by univariate (log rank test) and multivariate (Cox regression model) statistical analyses. Between 1981 and 2000, 652 patients (443 males and 209 females) underwent tumor nephrectomy in our clinic for the diagnosis of RCC. Of these, 243 patients revealed primary tumors with a local growth not extending beyond the renal capsula at the time of surgery. For the different cutoff levels (starting from 2 cm in increments of 1 cm up to 8 cm) that were selected to subdivide the patients into groups according to the maximum tumor diameter, the correlation between tumor size and overall survival was determined by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. It became evident that although during univariate analysis the prognostic value of a cutoff size of 4 cm was confirmed, multivariate analysis identified the highest relative risk for cause-specific death (2.93) for patients having tumors larger than 5 cm in maximum diameter. Therefore, the 5 cm cutoff seems to best determine the clinical prognosis of patients undergoing tumor nephrectomy for early stage RCC. The present study demonstrates the need for multivariate statistical approaches when the latest modification of the TNM classification system is critically evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15729558     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-004-0483-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  12 in total

1.  von Hippel-Lindau disease: renal tumors less than 3 cm. can metastasize.

Authors:  K J Turner; S M Huson; N Moore; B J Britton; D Cranston
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Reevaluation of the 1997 TNM classification for renal cell carcinoma: T1 and T2 cutoff point at 4.5 rather than 7 cm. better correlates with clinical outcome.

Authors:  A Zisman; A J Pantuck; D Chao; F Dorey; J W Said; B J Gitlitz; J B de Kernion; R A Figlin; A S Belldegrun
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma: Workgroup No. 3. Union International Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC).

Authors:  P Guinan; L H Sobin; F Algaba; F Badellino; S Kameyama; G MacLennan; A Novick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  J Javidan; H J Stricker; P Tamboli; M B Amin; J O Peabody; A Deshpande; M Menon; M B Amin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging.

Authors:  K S Hafez; A F Fergany; A C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma: significance of tumor classification with the 1997 TNM staging system.

Authors:  M T Gettman; M L Blute; B Spotts; S C Bryant; H Zincke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prognostic importance of tumor size for localized conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma: assessment of TNM T1 and T2 tumor categories and comparison with other prognostic parameters.

Authors:  Brett Delahunt; John M Kittelson; Margaret R E McCredie; Anthony E Reeve; John H Stewart; A Michael Bilous
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma--is tumor size a suitable parameter for indication?

Authors:  J Miller; C Fischer; R Freese; M Altmannsberger; W Weidner
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Nephron sparing surgery in incidental versus suspected renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M R Licht; A C Novick; M Goormastic
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery.

Authors:  S E Lerner; C A Hawkins; M L Blute; A Grabner; P C Wollan; J T Eickholt; H Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  MR classification of renal masses with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Ivan Pedrosa; Mary T Chou; Long Ngo; Ronaldo H Baroni; Elizabeth M Genega; Laura Galaburda; William C DeWolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Early renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Tomita
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Histopathological characteristics of localized renal cell carcinoma correlate with tumor size: a SEER analysis.

Authors:  Jason Rothman; Brian Egleston; Yu-Ning Wong; Kevan Iffrig; Steve Lebovitch; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  [Small incidental renal tumors. Evaluation and biological parameters].

Authors:  M Remzi; M Memarsadeghi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  The impact of tumour size on the probability of synchronous metastasis and survival in renal cell carcinoma patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  Johann P Ingimarsson; Martin I Sigurdsson; Sverrir Hardarson; Vigdis Petursdottir; Eirikur Jonsson; Gudmundur V Einarsson; Tomas Gudbjartsson
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.