Literature DB >> 10569540

Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging.

K S Hafez1, A F Fergany, A C Novick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied the impact of tumor size on patient survival and tumor recurrence following nephron sparing surgery for localized sporadic renal cell carcinoma. In addition, we evaluated the usefulness of the new TNM staging system in which T1 versus T2 tumor status is delineated by tumor size 7 or less versus more than 7 cm., respectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of nephron sparing surgery for localized sporadic renal cell carcinoma in 485 patients treated before 1997 were reviewed. Patients were divided into groups according to tumor size as 1--2.5 or less (142), 2--2.5 to 4.0 (168), 3--more than 4 to 7 (125) and 4--more than 7 cm (50). Mean postoperative followup was 47 months.
RESULTS: Overall and cancer specific 5-year survival for the entire series was 81 and 92%, respectively. Of 44 patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma 16 (3.2%) had local recurrence and 28 (5.8%) had metastatic disease. There was no difference in 5-year cancer specific survival or tumor recurrence between groups 1 and 2 or groups 3 and 4. However, these outcome measures were significantly more favorable in groups 1 and 2 combined (tumors 4 cm. or less) compared to groups 3 and 4 combined (tumors more than 4 cm.) (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Following nephron sparing surgery for localized sporadic renal cell carcinoma cancer-free survival is significantly better in patients with tumors 4 cm. or less compared to those with larger tumors. The usefulness of the current TNM staging system can be improved by subdividing T1 tumors into T1a (4 cm. or less) and T1b (4 to 7 cm.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10569540     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68071-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  89 in total

Review 1.  Should there be a size limit for elective nephron-sparing surgery?

Authors:  Kent G Krejci; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Partial nephrectomy is not the proven standard for Stage T1b renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tony Finelli
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Management of locally recurrent kidney cancer.

Authors:  Eric A Singer; Gennady Bratslavsky
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Results of kidney tumor cryoablation: renal function preservation and oncologic efficacy.

Authors:  Adam C Mues; Jaime Landman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Maximum tensile force of different suture techniques in reconstruction of the renal remnant after nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  J Simon; F Finter; A Ignatius; M Meilinger; L Dürselen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  [Renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  A Haferkamp; D Rohde; S C Müller; H Rübben; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Best of the 2002 AUA Annual Meeting: Highlights of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association May 25-30, 2002, Orlando, FL.

Authors: 
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

8.  [Renal cell carcinoma--developments in therapy].

Authors:  M Marberger; G Janetschek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  The case for radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Mark Louie-Johnsun; Andre Lalak
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass : a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Kunkle; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.