Literature DB >> 15727245

Variants of uncertain clinical significance as a result of BRCA1/2 testing: impact of an ambiguous breast cancer risk message.

Sandra van Dijk1, Christi J van Asperen, Catharina E Jacobi, Geraldine R Vink, Aad Tibben, Martijn H Breuning, Wilma Otten.   

Abstract

The identification of an increasing number of variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUCS) in genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer poses serious problems for genetic counseling, because no data are available about the psychosocial impact of discussing such an unclear risk message. The current study is the first to present data on how test applicants actually understand and cope with such a result if communicated by a geneticist. We compared 10 women who received a VUCS result with 34 women who carried the deleterious mutation, 37 women who did not carry the deleterious mutation or 'true negatives,' and 160 women who received a so-called inconclusive result before and after test disclosure. Women, with whom a VUCS result was discussed, reported quite a high level of comprehension of the result. In addition, compared with the pretest measures, they did not report a higher level of perceived risk (p = 0.58) and even reported a decrease in breast cancer distress (p = 0.03). They were very comparable to women who received an inconclusive result on all post-disclosure measures. Our results suggest that discussing a VUCS result in genetic counseling does not give rise for concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15727245     DOI: 10.1089/gte.2004.8.235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  16 in total

1.  Consensus: a framework for evaluation of uncertain gene variants in laboratory test reporting.

Authors:  David K Crockett; Perry G Ridge; Andrew R Wilson; Elaine Lyon; Marc S Williams; Scott P Narus; Julio C Facelli; Joyce A Mitchell
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  Clinical Variant Classification: A Comparison of Public Databases and a Commercial Testing Laboratory.

Authors:  William Gradishar; KariAnne Johnson; Krystal Brown; Erin Mundt; Susan Manley
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-04-13

3.  Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress.

Authors:  J O Culver; C D Brinkerhoff; J Clague; K Yang; K E Singh; S R Sand; J N Weitzel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Christine Rini; Rachel E Goldsmith; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Lawrence H Cohen; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Patient Recall, Interpretation, and Perspective of an Inconclusive Long QT Syndrome Genetic Test Result.

Authors:  Sarah Predham; Julie Hathaway; Gurdip Hulait; Laura Arbour; Anna Lehman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Primary care providers' willingness to recommend BRCA1/2 testing to adolescents.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Beth N Peshkin; George Luta; Anisha Abraham; Leslie R Walker; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  Genetic counseling and testing for common hereditary breast cancer syndromes: a paper from the 2007 William Beaumont hospital symposium on molecular pathology.

Authors:  Dawn C Allain
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Quality of life and its relation to cancer-related stress in women of families with hereditary cancer without demonstrated mutation.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Lovise Maehle; Ketil Heimdal; Astrid Stormorken; Pål Møller; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Heather A Douglas; Rebekah J Hamilton; Robin E Grubs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Disclosure of cardiac variants of uncertain significance results in an exome cohort.

Authors:  T A Lawal; K L Lewis; J J Johnston; A R Heidlebaugh; D Ng; F G Gaston-Johansson; W M P Klein; B B Biesecker; L G Biesecker
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.