Literature DB >> 15725937

How significant are clinically insignificant residual fragments following lithotripsy?

Yeh Hong Tan1, Michael Wong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy had revolutionized the treatment of kidney stones. Residual fragments smaller than 4 or 5 mm which are asymptomatic and likely to pass spontaneously are termed as clinically insignificant residual fragments. This article reviews the current literature with regards to the management of clinically insignificant residual fragments. RECENT
FINDINGS: However, the term is controversial because no consensus has been reached regarding its exact definition or interval after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy to evaluate its presence. While most small residual stone fragments might be managed expectantly, a significant number of patients might become symptomatic or require intervention. These so-called clinically insignificant residual fragments have the potential to cause obstruction and are important risk factors for stone recurrence and re-growth.
SUMMARY: Residual fragments require close monitoring for stone growth, potential complications and subsequent intervention. Secondary procedures may be applied selectively to those patients who have significant symptoms of obstruction associated with the residual stone. Medical therapy might play an important role in the management of residual fragments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15725937     DOI: 10.1097/01.mou.0000160628.43860.f9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  10 in total

1.  Medium-term follow-up of clinically insignificant residual fragments after minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prognostic features and risk factors.

Authors:  Xin Li; Long He; Jianzhong Li; Zhongyang Duan; Zijian Gao; Long Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

2.  A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Nihat Karakoyunlu; Goksel Goktug; Nevzat Can Şener; Kursad Zengin; Ismail Nalbant; Ufuk Ozturk; Ugur Ozok; Abdurrahim Imamoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Clearance rates of residual stone fragments and dusts after endoscopic lithotripsy procedures using a holmium laser: 2-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Minyong Kang; Hwancheol Son; Hyeon Jeong; Min Chul Cho; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Stone treatment tomorrow and the day after].

Authors:  A Miernik; S Hein; F Adams; J Halbritter; M Schoenthaler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Efficacy of retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi >2 cm.

Authors:  M J Bader; C Gratzke; S Walther; P Weidlich; M Staehler; M Seitz; R Sroka; O Reich; C G Stief; B Schlenker
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-03-04

6.  The effect of terpene combination on ureter calculus expulsion after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Dai Hee Kim; Hyeok Jun Goh; Ho Won Lee; Kyu Shik Kim; Yong Tae Kim; Hong Sang Moon; Seung Wook Lee; Sung Yul Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-01-15

Review 7.  Clinical significance of residual fragments in 2015: impact, detection, and how to avoid them.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Arkadiusz Miernik; Konrad Wilhelm; Fabian Adams; Daniel Schlager; Thomas R W Herrmann; Jens J Rassweiler; Martin Schoenthaler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Impact of Residual Fragments following Endourological Treatments in Renal Stones.

Authors:  Cenk Acar; Cag Cal
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-07-05

9.  Immediate versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for inaccessible stones after uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Esam A E Desoky; Amr M Fawzi; Ahmed Sakr; Ahmed Eliwa; Ehab R El Sayed; Diab El Sayed; Asharf M S Shahin; Emad A Salem; Hussien M Kamel; Waleed Shabana; Mostafa Kamel
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-12-28

10.  Grooved vs smooth ureteric stent before extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: Single-blind randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Abdulqadir Alobaidy; Tarek Ibrahim; Walid El Ansari; Hosam Tawfik; Abdulla Al-Naimi; Salam Hussain; Abdulla Al-Ansari
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2021-12-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.