Literature DB >> 15721847

Transepicardial autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cell therapy in a porcine model of chronically infarcted myocardium.

Ron Waksman1, Jana Fournadjiev, Richard Baffour, Rajbabu Pakala, David Hellinga, Laurent Leborgne, Hamid Yazdi, Edouard Cheneau, Roswitha Wolfram, Rufus Seabron, Kenneth Horton, Frank Kolodgie, Renu Virmani, Elias Rivera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cell therapy is becoming a viable strategy to improve revascularization and myocardial function after myocardial injury. We evaluated the effect of bone marrow-derived mononuclear cell (BMMNC) transplantation on collateral vessel development and myocardial function in a porcine model of chronically infarcted heart.
METHODS: Myocardial infarction was produced in 13 domestic swine. At 4 weeks, animals were randomized to receive transepicardial injections of autologous BMMNCs (approximately 24x10(6) cells, n=8) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS; control, n=5) into infarcted and border regions. Collateral growth, angiogenesis, and infarct size were assessed by angiography, immunohistochemistry, and histomorphometry.
RESULTS: Regional contractility was assessed by transepicardial echocardiography at baseline and 4 weeks following treatment. Angiography revealed a trend toward increased collateral growth in the BMMNC group. Wall motion score index (myocardial function) was similar in both groups at baseline (1.63+/-0.16 vs. 1.25+/-0.25, P=.21) and at 4 weeks (1.83+/-0.22 vs. 1.63+/-0.38, P=.62). alpha-Actin-positive smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and Factor VIII positive endothelial cells were significantly greater in the BMMNC-injected animals (314.8+/-37.4/0.1 vs. 167.1+/-11.9/0.1 mm(2) in controls, P=.02, and 363.3+/-28.2 cells/0.1 mm(2) vs. 254.4+/-28.1 cells/0.1 mm(2) in controls, P=.03, respectively). The number of blood vessels >50 mum in diameter was significantly increased in the BMMNC group (317.9+/-54.9 vs. 149.1+/-6.1, P<.05). The size of the infarct area was smaller in the BMMNC-transplanted group than in the controls (P=.015).
CONCLUSION: BMMNC transplantation appears to improve angiogenesis and reduce infarct size yet results in no improvement in left ventricular function in a chronically infarcted heart.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15721847     DOI: 10.1016/j.carrad.2004.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Radiat Med        ISSN: 1522-1865


  9 in total

Review 1.  Stem cells in the heart: what's the buzz all about? Part 2: Arrhythmic risks and clinical studies.

Authors:  Rachel Ruckdeschel Smith; Lucio Barile; Elisa Messina; Eduardo Marbán
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 2.  Cell therapy for heart failure: a comprehensive overview of experimental and clinical studies, current challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Santosh K Sanganalmath; Roberto Bolli
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Cortical Bone Stem Cell Therapy Preserves Cardiac Structure and Function After Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Thomas E Sharp; Giana J Schena; Alexander R Hobby; Timothy Starosta; Remus M Berretta; Markus Wallner; Giulia Borghetti; Polina Gross; Daohai Yu; Jaslyn Johnson; Eric Feldsott; Danielle M Trappanese; Amir Toib; Joseph E Rabinowitz; Jon C George; Hajime Kubo; Sadia Mohsin; Steven R Houser
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 4.  Preclinical Studies of Stem Cell Therapy for Heart Disease.

Authors:  Bryon A Tompkins; Wayne Balkan; Johannes Winkler; Mariann Gyöngyösi; Georg Goliasch; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Joshua M Hare
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 5.  Stem cell therapy for chronic myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Manuel Mazo; Beatriz Pelacho; Felipe Prósper
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Intracoronary delivery of autologous cardiac stem cells improves cardiac function in a porcine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Roberto Bolli; Xian-Liang Tang; Santosh K Sanganalmath; Ornella Rimoldi; Federico Mosna; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Hani Jneid; Marcello Rota; Annarosa Leri; Jan Kajstura
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Stem cell therapy and breast cancer treatment: review of stem cell research and potential therapeutic impact against cardiotoxicities due to breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Thomas E Sharp; Jon C George
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Cell tracking and therapy evaluation of bone marrow monocytes and stromal cells using SPECT and CMR in a canine model of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gerald Wisenberg; Katie Lekx; Pam Zabel; Huafu Kong; Rupinder Mann; Peter R Zeman; Sudip Datta; Caroline N Culshaw; Peter Merrifield; Yves Bureau; Glenn Wells; Jane Sykes; Frank S Prato
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Mending a broken heart: current strategies and limitations of cell-based therapy.

Authors:  Lee Chuen Liew; Beatrice Xuan Ho; Boon-Seng Soh
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 6.832

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.