Literature DB >> 15720620

Family level inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems.

John K Kelly1.   

Abstract

Variation in the magnitude of inbreeding depression (ID) among families may have important consequences for mating system evolution. Experimental studies have shown that such variation is a common feature of natural plant populations. Unfortunately, the genetic and evolutionary significance of family level estimates remains obscure. Almost any kind of genetic variation will generate differences in ID among families, and as a consequence, a non-zero variance in family level ID is not sufficient to distinguish genetic architectures with wholly different implications for mating system evolution. Quantitative genetic methods provide a means to extract more information from ID experiments. Estimates of quantitative genetic variance components directly inform questions about the genetic basis of ID and should ultimately allow tests of alternative theories of mating system evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15720620     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01184.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  7 in total

1.  A genetic interpretation of the variation in inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Gene-expression changes caused by inbreeding protect against inbreeding depression in Drosophila.

Authors:  Carlos García; Victoria Avila; Humberto Quesada; Armando Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Transposable elements in a marginal plant population: temporal fluctuations provide new insights into genome evolution of wild diploid wheat.

Authors:  Alexander Belyayev; Ruslan Kalendar; Leonid Brodsky; Eviatar Nevo; Alan H Schulman; Olga Raskina
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2010-02-01

4.  Domestication reshaped the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in a maize landrace compared to its wild relative, teosinte.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Samayoa; Bode A Olukolu; Chin Jian Yang; Qiuyue Chen; Markus G Stetter; Alessandra M York; Jose de Jesus Sanchez-Gonzalez; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Peter J Bradbury; Maria Cinta Romay; Qi Sun; Jinliang Yang; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Edward S Buckler; John F Doebley; James B Holland
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Inbreeding depression in self-incompatible North-American Arabidopsis lyrata: disentangling genomic and S-locus-specific genetic load.

Authors:  M Stift; B D Hunter; B Shaw; A Adam; P N Hoebe; B K Mable
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Inbreeding depression in Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae), a species with a plastic self-incompatibility response.

Authors:  Jorge I Mena-Ali; Lidewij H Keser; Andrew G Stephenson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Inbreeding in Mimulus guttatus reduces visitation by bumble bee pollinators.

Authors:  David E Carr; T'ai H Roulston; Haley Hart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.