Literature DB >> 1572041

Three-dimensional potential gradient fields generated by intracardiac catheter and cutaneous patch electrodes.

A S Tang1, P D Wolf, Y Afework, W M Smith, R E Ideker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Defibrillation may be improved if electrode configurations can be found that create a larger and more even voltage gradient field across the heart. This study determined the magnitude of the shock gradient fields generated by four nonthoracotomy electrode configurations for defibrillation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In six dogs, a catheter was inserted containing a right ventricular apical electrode (V) and a right atrial electrode (A). A cutaneous patch electrode (P) was placed on the left lateral thorax. Shock potentials were recorded simultaneously from 128 electrodes in the left ventricular and right ventricular subepicardium and subendocardium, ventricular septum, and atria. With the chest closed, 50-mA shocks were given during diastole via the following lead configurations: V----A (V, cathode; A, anode); V----P; V----A+P; and V+A----P. Potential gradients were calculated at the subepicardium and subendocardium in millivolts per centimeter per volt of shock. In most dogs, the V----A+P configuration produced higher gradients throughout the ventricles than did V----A, V----P, or V+A----P. The maximum potential gradient was smaller for the V+A----P configuration than for V----A, V----P, or V----A+P. The gradient fields for the configurations with the catheter alone or combined with P were uneven.
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to estimate shock gradient fields in three dimensions. Of the four configurations tested, V----A+P produced the highest gradients and V+A----P produced the lowest high gradient. The gradient fields were uneven throughout the ventricles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1572041     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.85.5.1857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  13 in total

1.  Tunnel propagation following defibrillation with ICD shocks: hidden postshock activations in the left ventricular wall underlie isoelectric window.

Authors:  Jason Constantino; Yun Long; Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  A generalized activating function for predicting virtual electrodes in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  E A Sobie; R C Susil; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Substernal lead implantation: a novel option to manage DFT failure in S-ICD patients.

Authors:  M Guenther; S Kolschmann; M Knaut
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  A systematic evaluation of conventional and novel transvenous pathways for defibrillation.

Authors:  P R Roberts; S Allen; D C Smith; J F Urban; D E Euler; R W Dahl; M J Kallok; J M Morgan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Termination of spiral waves during cardiac fibrillation via shock-induced phase resetting.

Authors:  Richard A Gray; Nipon Chattipakorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Increased defibrillation threshold with right-sided active pectoral can.

Authors:  P R Roberts; S Allen; T Betts; J M Morgan; J F Urban; T Whitman; D E Euler; M J Kallok
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Transmural recording of shock potential gradient fields, early postshock activations, and refibrillation episodes associated with external defibrillation of long-duration ventricular fibrillation in swine.

Authors:  James D Allred; Cheryl R Killingsworth; J Scott Allison; Derek J Dosdall; Sharon B Melnick; William M Smith; Raymond E Ideker; Gregory P Walcott
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Comparison of low-energy versus high-energy biphasic defibrillation shocks following prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Gregory P Walcott; Sharon B Melnick; Cheryl R Killingsworth; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.077

9.  [Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Authors:  S Reek; R E Ideker
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

10.  A computer modeling tool for comparing novel ICD electrode orientations in children and adults.

Authors:  Matthew Jolley; Jeroen Stinstra; Steve Pieper; Rob Macleod; Dana H Brooks; Frank Cecchin; John K Triedman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 6.343

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.