Literature DB >> 1571911

Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone.

C A Perez1, P W Grigsby, S M Nene, H M Camel, A Galakatos, M S Kao, M A Lockett.   

Abstract

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 1178 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. The minimum follow-up time was 3 years. The 10-year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IB was 6% for tumors less than 3 cm, 15% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 30% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.0018). The 10-year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IIA was 10% for tumors less than 3 cm, 28% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 20% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.09). Stage IIB unilateral nonbulky tumors (less than 5 cm) had a 20% pelvic failure rate compared with 28% for bilateral lesions and 35% for unilateral bulky tumors (more than 5 cm) (P = 0.35). In Stage IIB, pelvic failures were greater when disease extended into the lateral parametrium (30%) compared with medial parametrial involvement only (17%) (P = 0.01). In Stage III unilateral nonbulky tumors, the pelvic failure rate was 28% compared with 45% to 50% for unilateral bulky lesions (P = 0.002). Bilateral parametrial disease in Stage IIB did not increase the pelvic failure rate (21% in both subgroups) (P = 0.83), whereas in Stage III, bilateral parametrial involvement was associated with a 48% pelvic failure rate versus 28% for unilateral extension (P less than or equal to 0.01). Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates for IB tumors less than or equal to 3 cm was 90% versus 67% for tumors more than 3 cm (P = 0.01). In Stage IIA tumors less than or equal to 3 cm, 5-year DFS was 70% versus 45% for tumors more than 3 cm. Patients with Stage IIB nonbulky tumors (less than or equal to 5 cm in diameter) had better 10-year DFS (65% to 70%) compared with those with bilateral bulky tumors (45% to 55%) (P = 0.10). Stage III patients with unilateral nonbulky tumors had a 55% 10-year DFS compared with 35% to 40% for bulky tumors or bilateral parametrial involvement (P = 0.002). The authors concluded that clinical stage and size of tumor are critical factors in the prognosis, therapy selection, and evaluation of results in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1571911     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920601)69:11<2796::aid-cncr2820691127>3.0.co;2-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

1.  Sequential magnetic resonance imaging of cervical cancer: the predictive value of absolute tumor volume and regression ratio measured before, during, and after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jian Z Wang; Nina A Mayr; Dongqing Zhang; Kaile Li; John C Grecula; Joseph F Montebello; Simon S Lo; William T C Yuh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  A review of recent developments in image-guided radiation therapy in cervix cancer.

Authors:  Azmat H Sadozye; Nicholas Reed
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  The SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose) and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-ag) function as prognostic biomarkers in patients with primary cervical cancer.

Authors:  LingLing Pan; JingYi Cheng; Min Zhou; ZhiFeng Yao; YingJian Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus radiotherapy in locally advanced chemoresistant cervical cancer.

Authors:  Youn Seok Choi; Jeong-Im Sin; Ju Hyun Kim; Gi Won Ye; Im Hee Shin; Tae Sung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Local Radiotherapy or Chemotherapy for Oligo-recurrent Cervical Cancer in Patients With Prior Pelvic Irradiation.

Authors:  Kazuma Kobayashi; Naoya Murakami; Kana Takahashi; Koji Inaba; Ryuji Hamamoto; Jun Itami
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  A preliminary investigation into textural features of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity in (18)F-FDG PET for overall survival prognosis in patients with bulky cervical cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Kung-Chu Ho; Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Hsiao-Wen Chung; Tzu-Chen Yen; Tsung-Ying Ho; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Ji-Hong Hong; Yi-Ting Huang; Chun-Chieh Wang; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-07-06

Review 7.  DNA hypermethylation biomarkers to predict response to cisplatin treatment, radiotherapy or chemoradiation: the present state of art.

Authors:  Frank Roossink; Steven de Jong; G Bea A Wisman; Ate G J van der Zee; Ed Schuuring
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 6.730

8.  Comparative study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical hysterectomy and radical surgery alone in stage IB2-IIA bulky cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yun-Hyun Cho; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Predicting outcomes in cervical cancer: a kinetic model of tumor regression during radiation therapy.

Authors:  Zhibin Huang; Nina A Mayr; William T C Yuh; Simon S Lo; Joseph F Montebello; John C Grecula; Lanchun Lu; Kaile Li; Hualin Zhang; Nilendu Gupta; Jian Z Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Treatment patterns of FIGO Stage IB2 cervical cancer: a single-institution experience of radical hysterectomy with individualized postoperative therapy and definitive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Oliver Zivanovic; Kaled M Alektiar; Yukio Sonoda; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; William P Tew; John P Diaz; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.