Literature DB >> 18774596

Treatment patterns of FIGO Stage IB2 cervical cancer: a single-institution experience of radical hysterectomy with individualized postoperative therapy and definitive radiation therapy.

Oliver Zivanovic1, Kaled M Alektiar, Yukio Sonoda, Qin Zhou, Alexia Iasonos, William P Tew, John P Diaz, Dennis S Chi, Richard R Barakat, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer is controversial. Our aim was to assess treatment patterns, outcomes, and complications in patients with stage IB2 cervical cancer.
METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with stage IB2 cervical carcinoma at a single institution between January 1982 and September 2006 was performed. To adequately control treatment variables, we only included patients who underwent their entire treatment at our institution. Toxicity was assessed using NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC).
RESULTS: We identified 82 patients, of whom 47 met the strict inclusion criteria. Of these, 27 patients (57%) underwent primary radical hysterectomy (RH) and 20 (43%) were treated with definitive radiation/chemoradiation therapy (RT/CRT). Patients selected for RT/CRT had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score than those selected for surgery (P=0.037). The 3-year progression free survival rate was 52% for the RH group and 55% for the RT/CRT group (P=0.977). The 3-year overall survival rates were 72% and 55%, respectively (P=0.161). Overall, 52% of patients in the RH group received postoperative radiation therapy as part of their adjuvant treatment. CTC grade 3, 4, and 5 complications affected 5 patients (19%) in the RH group and 3 (15%) in the RT/CRT group.
CONCLUSION: Both RH and definitive RT/CRT are adequate management strategies for patients with FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer. However, there was a subset of patients in whom RH as monotherapy was appropriate. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of new preoperative models that will accurately identify these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18774596      PMCID: PMC3932675          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  26 in total

1.  Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000.

Authors:  D M Parkin; F Bray; J Ferlay; P Pisani
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Radical pelvic surgery versus radiation therapy for stage I carcinoma of the cervix (exclusive of microinvasion).

Authors:  G W Morley; J C Seski
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  M S Piver; F Rutledge; J P Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Stage IB carcinoma of the cervix, the Norwegian Radium Hospital: results and complications. III. Urinary and gastrointestinal complications.

Authors:  K E Kjorstad; P W Martimbeau; T Iversen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Prognostic significance of cervical lesion size and pelvic node metastases in cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  M S Piver; W S Chung
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Randomized trial of neoadjuvant cisplatin, vincristine, bleomycin, and radical hysterectomy versus radiation therapy for bulky stage IB and IIA cervical cancer.

Authors:  T C Chang; C H Lai; J H Hong; S Hsueh; K G Huang; H H Chou; C J Tseng; C S Tsai; J T Chang; C T Lin; H H Chang; P J Chao; K K Ng; S G Tang; Y K Soong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  W A Peters; P Y Liu; R J Barrett; R J Stock; B J Monk; J S Berek; L Souhami; P Grigsby; W Gordon; D S Alberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Determinants of increased risk for recurrence in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for stage IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  A F Fuller; N Elliott; C Kosloff; W J Hoskins; J L Lewis
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Relationship of lesion size to survival in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri treated by radiation therapy.

Authors:  H D Homesley; M Raben; D D Blake; C R Ferree; M S Bullock; E B Linton; F C Greiss; A L Rhyne
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1980-04

10.  Radiation therapy with and without extrafascial hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma: a randomized trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Authors:  Henry M Keys; Brian N Bundy; Frederick B Stehman; Takashi Okagaki; Donald G Gallup; Alexander F Burnett; Marvin Z Rotman; Wesley C Fowler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  9 in total

1.  Does the Robotic Platform Reduce Morbidity Associated With Combined Radical Surgery and Adjuvant Radiation for Early Cervical Cancers?

Authors:  Leslie H Clark; Emma L Barber; Paola A Gehrig; John T Soper; John F Boggess; Kenneth H Kim
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Quadruple synchronous primary cancers in a single patient.

Authors:  Elin Albertsdottir; Jacob Juel
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 3.  Type II or type III radical hysterectomy compared to chemoradiotherapy as a primary intervention for stage IB2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Vivek Nama; Georgios Angelopoulos; Jeremy Twigg; John B Murdoch; Jo Bailey; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-12

4.  An Alternative Triage Strategy Based on Preoperative MRI for Avoiding Trimodality Therapy in Stage IB Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jung-Yun Lee; Jina Youm; Jae Weon Kim; Kidong Kim; Hak Jae Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Min A Kim; Noh Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.679

5.  A retrospective comparison of outcome in IB2 and IIA cervical cancer patients treated with primary concurrent chemoradiation versus radical hysterectomy with or without tailored adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Tae-Kyu Jang; So-Jin Shin; Hyewon Chung; Sang-Hoon Kwon; Soon-Do Cha; Eunbi Lee; Changmin Shin; Chi-Heum Cho
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-10-17

6.  Practice guidelines for management of cervical cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Myong Cheol Lim; Maria Lee; Seung Hyuk Shim; Eun Ji Nam; Jung Yun Lee; Hyun Jung Kim; Yoo Young Lee; Kwang Beom Lee; Jeong Yeol Park; Yun Hwan Kim; Kyung Do Ki; Yong Jung Song; Hyun Hoon Chung; Sunghoon Kim; Jeong Won Lee; Jae Weon Kim; Duk Soo Bae; Jong Min Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Primary radical hysterectomy vs chemoradiation for IB2-IIA cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruo-Nan Yan; Zhen Zeng; Fang Liu; Yuan-Yuan Zeng; Tao He; Zhong-Zheng Xiang; Bai-Lu Zhang; Han-Lin Gong; Lei Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Comparison of treatment outcomes of surgery and radiotherapy, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage Ib2-IIb cervical adenocarcinoma patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Eiji Kondo; Kenta Yoshida; Tsutomu Tabata; Yoichi Kobayashi; Wataru Yamagami; Yasuhiko Ebina; Masanori Kaneuchi; Satoru Nagase; Hiroko Machida; Mikio Mikami
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Comparison of outcomes between radical hysterectomy followed by tailored adjuvant therapy versus primary chemoradiation therapy in IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Young-Seok Kim; Ha Jeong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Seung Jae Huh; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.401

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.