BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging at b = 2000 s/mm(2) offers theoretical advantages over DW imaging at b = 1000 s/mm(2) for detection of hyperacute ischemic stroke. The purpose of this study was to determine whether b = 2000 images are better than b = 1000 images for detecting and estimating the extent of diffusion change within 6 hours after stroke onset. METHODS: We compared DW images obtained with a b value of 1000 s/mm(2) (TR/TE/NEX, 7500/71/1) with those obtained with a b value of 2000 s/mm(2) (TR/TE/NEX, 7500/83/2) in 94 patients examined within 6 hours of clinically suspicious hyperacute ischemic stroke (57 men, 37 women; mean age +/- SD, 62 years +/- 8; age range, 47-80 years; mean time interval +/- SD, 206 +/- 90 min). Three observers performed qualitative analysis of DW images and reached a consensus about lesion conspicuity, lesion extent, and image artifact. In the quantitative analysis of 34 patients with lesions in the territory of the middle cerebral artery, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and volume of ischemic lesion were measured and findings of the b = 1000 and b = 2000 images were compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of b = 1000 and b = 2000 images were calculated as 94% (80/85)/ 100% (9/9) and 98% (83/85)/ 100% (9/9), respectively, relative to the presence or absence of infarction on the follow-up T2-weighted images. In three patients, hyperintense lesions were depicted only on b = 2000 images. On qualitative analysis, lesions were more conspicuous and larger on b = 2000 images in 23 and 11 patients, respectively. On quantitative analysis, as the b value increased, the mean lesion volume increased by 47% (22.1 +/- 27.9 mL at b = 1000 s/mm(2) versus 32.5 +/- 36.5 mL at b = 2000 s/mm(2), P < .001, n = 34). As the b value increased, mean SNR decreased both in the lesion and in the contralateral normal area by 17% and 28%, respectively, but the mean CNR increased by 23% (8.7 +/- 6.4 at b = 1000 s/mm(2) versus 10.7 +/- 6.5 at b = 2000 s/mm(2), P < .001, n = 34). CONCLUSION: DW images acquired with a b value of 2000 s/mm(2) were better than DW images acquired with a b value of 1000 s/mm(2) for the detection and estimation of the extent of diffusion change in patients examined within 6 hours of ischemic stroke onset.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging at b = 2000 s/mm(2) offers theoretical advantages over DW imaging at b = 1000 s/mm(2) for detection of hyperacute ischemic stroke. The purpose of this study was to determine whether b = 2000 images are better than b = 1000 images for detecting and estimating the extent of diffusion change within 6 hours after stroke onset. METHODS: We compared DW images obtained with a b value of 1000 s/mm(2) (TR/TE/NEX, 7500/71/1) with those obtained with a b value of 2000 s/mm(2) (TR/TE/NEX, 7500/83/2) in 94 patients examined within 6 hours of clinically suspicious hyperacute ischemic stroke (57 men, 37 women; mean age +/- SD, 62 years +/- 8; age range, 47-80 years; mean time interval +/- SD, 206 +/- 90 min). Three observers performed qualitative analysis of DW images and reached a consensus about lesion conspicuity, lesion extent, and image artifact. In the quantitative analysis of 34 patients with lesions in the territory of the middle cerebral artery, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and volume of ischemic lesion were measured and findings of the b = 1000 and b = 2000 images were compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of b = 1000 and b = 2000 images were calculated as 94% (80/85)/ 100% (9/9) and 98% (83/85)/ 100% (9/9), respectively, relative to the presence or absence of infarction on the follow-up T2-weighted images. In three patients, hyperintense lesions were depicted only on b = 2000 images. On qualitative analysis, lesions were more conspicuous and larger on b = 2000 images in 23 and 11 patients, respectively. On quantitative analysis, as the b value increased, the mean lesion volume increased by 47% (22.1 +/- 27.9 mL at b = 1000 s/mm(2) versus 32.5 +/- 36.5 mL at b = 2000 s/mm(2), P < .001, n = 34). As the b value increased, mean SNR decreased both in the lesion and in the contralateral normal area by 17% and 28%, respectively, but the mean CNR increased by 23% (8.7 +/- 6.4 at b = 1000 s/mm(2) versus 10.7 +/- 6.5 at b = 2000 s/mm(2), P < .001, n = 34). CONCLUSION: DW images acquired with a b value of 2000 s/mm(2) were better than DW images acquired with a b value of 1000 s/mm(2) for the detection and estimation of the extent of diffusion change in patients examined within 6 hours of ischemic stroke onset.
Authors: P M Desmond; A C Lovell; A A Rawlinson; M W Parsons; P A Barber; Q Yang; T Li; D G Darby; R P Gerraty; S M Davis; B M Tress Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: James D Eastwood; Michael H Lev; Max Wintermark; Clemens Fitzek; Daniel P Barboriak; David M Delong; Ting-Yim Lee; Tarek Azhari; Michael Herzau; Vani R Chilukuri; James M Provenzale Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: W Hacke; M Kaste; C Fieschi; D Toni; E Lesaffre; R von Kummer; G Boysen; E Bluhmki; G Höxter; M H Mahagne Journal: JAMA Date: 1995-10-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: K O Lövblad; H J Laubach; A E Baird; F Curtin; G Schlaug; R R Edelman; S Warach Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1998 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J P Mohr; J Biller; S K Hilal; W T Yuh; T K Tatemichi; S Hedges; E Tali; H Nguyen; I Mun; H P Adams Journal: Stroke Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: V Tomar; A Yadav; R K S Rathore; S Verma; R Awasthi; V Bharadwaj; B K Ojha; K N Prasad; R K Gupta Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Hongyoon Choi; Marek Kubicki; Thomas J Whitford; Jorge L Alvarado; Douglas P Terry; Margaret Niznikiewicz; Robert W McCarley; Jun Soo Kwon; Martha E Shenton Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: H Hyare; J Thornton; J Stevens; S Mead; P Rudge; J Collinge; T A Yousry; H R Jäger Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 3.825