BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no reproducibility study of fractional anisotropy (FA) measurements at 3T using regions of interest (ROIs). Our purpose was to establish the extent and statistical significance of the interrater variability, the variability observed with 2 different b-values, and in 2 separate scanning sessions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers underwent MR imaging twice. MR imaging was performed on a 3T unit, and FA maps were analyzed independently by 2 observers using ROIs positioned in the corpus callosum, internal capsules, corticospinal tracts, and right thalamus. Changes in FA values (x10(3)) measured with 2 b-values (700 and 1000 s/mm(2)), age-related differences, interobserver agreement, and measurement reproducibility were assessed. RESULTS: In the right internal capsule genu (FA = 702/728; b = 1000/700 s/mm(2)) and the left anterior limb of the internal capsule (AIC; FA = 617/745; b = 1000/700 s/mm(2)), the FA values were significantly different between the 2 b-values (P = .02 and .05, respectively). Significant age-related differences in FA were observed in the genu of the corpus callosum and in the left AIC. Interrater measurements showed fair-to-moderate agreement for most anatomic structures. The lowest significant change for a single subject regarding any FA values between the 2 sessions was in the corpus callosum (4%), whereas the highest one was in the corticospinal tracts (27%). The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed that the 1000-s/mm(2) b-value gave satisfactorily reproducible measurements equally good or better than the 700-s/mm(2) b-value. CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of FA estimates using ROIs was satisfactory. Measurements with a b-value at 1000 s/mm(2) showed superior reproducibility in most anatomic locations.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no reproducibility study of fractional anisotropy (FA) measurements at 3T using regions of interest (ROIs). Our purpose was to establish the extent and statistical significance of the interrater variability, the variability observed with 2 different b-values, and in 2 separate scanning sessions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers underwent MR imaging twice. MR imaging was performed on a 3T unit, and FA maps were analyzed independently by 2 observers using ROIs positioned in the corpus callosum, internal capsules, corticospinal tracts, and right thalamus. Changes in FA values (x10(3)) measured with 2 b-values (700 and 1000 s/mm(2)), age-related differences, interobserver agreement, and measurement reproducibility were assessed. RESULTS: In the right internal capsule genu (FA = 702/728; b = 1000/700 s/mm(2)) and the left anterior limb of the internal capsule (AIC; FA = 617/745; b = 1000/700 s/mm(2)), the FA values were significantly different between the 2 b-values (P = .02 and .05, respectively). Significant age-related differences in FA were observed in the genu of the corpus callosum and in the left AIC. Interrater measurements showed fair-to-moderate agreement for most anatomic structures. The lowest significant change for a single subject regarding any FA values between the 2 sessions was in the corpus callosum (4%), whereas the highest one was in the corticospinal tracts (27%). The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed that the 1000-s/mm(2) b-value gave satisfactorily reproducible measurements equally good or better than the 700-s/mm(2) b-value. CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of FA estimates using ROIs was satisfactory. Measurements with a b-value at 1000 s/mm(2) showed superior reproducibility in most anatomic locations.
Authors: Jeffrey H Miller; Robert C McKinstry; Joseph V Philip; Pratik Mukherjee; Jeffrey J Neil Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Daniel S Reich; Seth A Smith; Kathleen M Zackowski; Eliza M Gordon-Lipkin; Craig K Jones; Jonathan A D Farrell; Susumu Mori; Peter C M van Zijl; Peter A Calabresi Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-08-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Michael Deppe; Thomas Duning; Siawoosh Mohammadi; Wolfram Schwindt; Harald Kugel; Stefan Knecht; E Bernd Ringelstein Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Regula S Briellmann; L Anne Mitchell; Anthony B Waites; David F Abbott; Gaby S Pell; Michael M Saling; Graeme D Jackson Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Jacobus F A Jansen; M Eline Kooi; Alfons G H Kessels; Klaas Nicolay; Walter H Backes Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Thierry A G M Huisman; Lee H Schwamm; Pamela W Schaefer; Walter J Koroshetz; Neetha Shetty-Alva; Yelda Ozsunar; Ona Wu; A Gregory Sorensen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: R J Fox; K Sakaie; J-C Lee; J P Debbins; Y Liu; D L Arnold; E R Melhem; C H Smith; M D Philips; M Lowe; E Fisher Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Patrick Veit-Haibach; Daniel Schmid; Klaus Strobel; Jan D Soyka; Niklaus G Schaefer; Stephan K Haerle; Gerhard Huber; Gabriele Studer; Burkhardt Seifert; Thomas F Hany Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-07-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nadia Barakat; Pallav Shah; Scott H Faro; John P Gaughan; Devon Middleton; M J Mulcahey; Feroze B Mohamed Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2015-09-28
Authors: Xu Chen; Bhargav Errangi; Longchuan Li; Matthew F Glasser; Lars T Westlye; Anders M Fjell; Kristine B Walhovd; Xiaoping Hu; James G Herndon; Todd M Preuss; James K Rilling Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: E M Palacios; A J Martin; M A Boss; F Ezekiel; Y S Chang; E L Yuh; M J Vassar; D M Schnyer; C L MacDonald; K L Crawford; A Irimia; A W Toga; P Mukherjee Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Fabiana C C Hirata; João R Sato; Gilson Vieira; Leandro T Lucato; Claudia C Leite; Edson Bor-Seng-Shu; Bruno F Pastorello; Maria C G Otaduy; Khallil T Chaim; Kenia R Campanholo; Natalia P Novaes; Luciano Magalhães Melo; Márcia R Gonçalves; Felipe Barjud Pereira do Nascimento; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Egberto Reis Barbosa; Edson Amaro; Ellison Fernando Cardoso Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Vijay K Venkatraman; Christopher E Gonzalez; Bennett Landman; Joshua Goh; David A Reiter; Yang An; Susan M Resnick Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 6.556