Literature DB >> 15708461

Optimising phase and amplitude modulation schemes for imaging microbubble contrast agents at low acoustic power.

Robert J Eckersley1, Chien Ting Chin, Peter N Burns.   

Abstract

A series of in vitro experiments were performed to determine the efficacy of generalised phase- and amplitude-modulated sequences for low-power nonlinear microbubble contrast imaging. The microbubble agent Definity (Dupont, Boston, MA) was exposed to sequences in which the phase and amplitude were changed from one pulse to the next. Echoes from these pulses were combined to suppress or enhance particular linear or nonlinear components. The results show that established two-pulse pulse-inversion and amplitude-modulation approaches perform similarly, providing 14 +/- 1 dB of enhancement, compared with the echoes from the linear scatterer. A two-pulse combined phase and amplitude sequence achieved an additional 4 +/- 1 dB of enhancement. This improvement is due to improved preservation of second and third order harmonic signals, while maintaining the suppression of the linear signals. These results were obtained at low power, below the threshold of microbubble destruction, and are applicable to real-time perfusion imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15708461     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  38 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the liver.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Junji Shiraishi; Fuminori Moriyasu; Kunio Doi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-28

2.  Assessment of the Superharmonic Response of Microbubble Contrast Agents for Acoustic Angiography as a Function of Microbubble Parameters.

Authors:  Isabel G Newsome; Thomas M Kierski; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  High and low frequency subharmonic imaging of angiogenesis in a murine breast cancer model.

Authors:  Manasi Dahibawkar; Mark A Forsberg; Aditi Gupta; Samantha Jaffe; Kelly Dulin; John R Eisenbrey; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; Anya I Forsberg; Jaydev K Dave; Andrew Marshall; Priscilla Machado; Traci B Fox; Ji-Bin Liu; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability.

Authors:  M-X Tang; H Mulvana; T Gauthier; A K P Lim; D O Cosgrove; R J Eckersley; E Stride
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Micro-ultrasound for preclinical imaging.

Authors:  F Stuart Foster; John Hossack; S Lee Adamson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 6.  Image-guided ultrasound phased arrays are a disruptive technology for non-invasive therapy.

Authors:  Kullervo Hynynen; Ryan M Jones
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Improved Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging With Multiplane-Wave Imaging.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Pengfei Song; Shigao Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Phase and Amplitude Modulation Methods for Nonlinear Ultrasound Imaging With CMUTs.

Authors:  Sarp Satir; F Levent Degertekin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Extended role outside 'regulations'.

Authors:  Paul S Sidhu
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2016-02-09

10.  Hadamard-Encoded Multipulses for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Pengfei Song; Shigao Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.