Literature DB >> 15707430

Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments.

H-J Chun1, D-N Park, C-H Han, S-J Heo, M-S Heo, J-Y Koak.   

Abstract

In this study, effects of different overdenture attachments on the stress distributions in the maxillary bone surrounding the overdenture implants are studied. Four different types of attachment are considered. They are rigid Dalbo Stud, movable Dalbo Stress Broken, movable Dalro, and movable O-ring attachments. Three-dimensional finite element analysis was conducted with commercial package to obtain the stress distributions in the maxillary bone. Varying the attachment types and angle of inclination of load, the stress distributions in the portions of compact bone and trabecular bone were monitored separately. The analysis was conducted by assuming two different boundary conditions at the interface between cap and overdenture abutment in order to evaluate influence of interface boundary condition on stress distribution in the maxillary bone. They were perfect bonding condition and contact with friction at the interfaces. However, it is preferable to assume perfect bond condition at the interface for rigid type attachment systems and contact with friction at the interface for movable type attachment systems. From the numerical results, it was found that the load transfer mechanism of the implant system is altered significantly by the types of the overdenture attachment and also special care must be taken to assign proper boundary conditions at the interface for the analysis. The movable type Dalro attachment generated the highest maximum effective stress in the maxillary bone among the models under the same inclined loading condition for contact with friction. The rigid type Dalbo Stud attachment generated the smallest maximum effective stress in the maxillary bone among the models under the same inclined loading condition for perfect bonding condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15707430     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01407.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  18 in total

1.  Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study.

Authors:  Zeynep Gümrükçü; Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Immediate versus Delayed Attachment Incorporation Impact on Prosthetic Aftercare among Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture Wearers.

Authors:  Eran Zenziper; Ofir Rosner; Oded Ghelfan; Joseph Nissan; Sigalit Blumer; Gil Ben-Izhack; Moshe Davidovich; Liat Chaushu; Adrian Kahn; Sarit Naishlos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Stress-strain distribution at bone-implant interface of two splinted overdenture systems using 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Mostafa Omran Hussein
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Finite element analysis on stress distribution of maxillary implant-retained overdentures depending on the Bar attachment design and palatal coverage.

Authors:  Min-Jeong Kim; Sung-Ok Hong
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Effect of attachment type on load distribution to implant abutments and the residual ridge in mandibular implant-supported overdentures.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Yoda; Yoshiki Matsudate; Masaru Abue; Guang Hong; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2015-03-16

6.  Biomechanical 3-dimensional finite element analysis of obturator protheses retained with zygomatic and dental implants in maxillary defects.

Authors:  Canan Akay; Suat Yaluğ
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-02-25

7.  Mechanical behavior of implant assisted removable partial denture for Kennedy class II.

Authors:  João-Paulo-Mendes Tribst; Rodrigo-Máximo de Araújo; Naiara-Pires Ramanzine; Natália-Ribeiro Santos; Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Borges; João-Mauricio-Ferraz da Silva
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-01-01

8.  A Comparison of Biomechanical Properties of Implant-Retained Overdenture Based on Precision Attachment Type.

Authors:  Małgorzata Idzior-Haufa; Agnieszka A Pilarska; Wiesław Hędzelek; Piotr Boniecki; Krzysztof Pilarski; Barbara Dorocka-Bobkowska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Evaluation of stress distribution of implant-retained mandibular overdenture with different vertical restorative spaces: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Mahmoud Farzin; Saeid Talebi; Niloufar Khodaeian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-11

Review 10.  Biomechanics of oral mucosa.

Authors:  Junning Chen; Rohana Ahmad; Wei Li; Michael Swain; Qing Li
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.