Literature DB >> 15704250

Two-stage Off-Gel isoelectric focusing: protein followed by peptide fractionation and application to proteome analysis of human plasma.

Manfred Heller1, Philippe E Michel, Patrick Morier, David Crettaz, Christian Wenz, Jean-Daniel Tissot, Frédéric Reymond, Joel S Rossier.   

Abstract

This paper presents the recently introduced Off-Gel electrophoresis (OGE) technology as a versatile tool to reproducibly fractionate intact proteins and peptides into discrete liquid fractions. The coupling of two stages of OGE, i.e., the separation of intact proteins in a first-stage followed by fractionation of peptides derived from each protein fraction after proteolysis in a second stage, results in an array of 15 x 15 fractions that are directly amenable to additional peptide fractionation like reverse-phase liquid chromatography (RPC). The analysis of all second-stage peptide fractions from only the first-stage protein fraction representing pH 5.0 -5.15 by on-line reverse-phase LC-tandem mass spectrometry resulted in the identification of 53 proteins (337 peptides), of which 10 were on different immunoglobulin (Ig) chains, with an input of only 1.5 mg human blood plasma proteins. Increasing the protein load to approximately 12 mg increased the number of identified proteins in the same protein fraction to 73 proteins (449 peptides), of which 15 were Ig-related. Immunodepletion of six of the most abundant proteins (albumin, transferrin, haptoglobin, IgG, IgA, and alpha-1-antitrypsin) prior to first-stage OGE with an input of 1.5 mg of protein (equivalent to approximately 10 mg nondepleted plasma) resulted in the identification of 81 proteins (660 peptides), of which three were still Ig fragments. The pI-based separation of peptides appears to be nonuniform based on the theoretically determined pI values of identified peptides. This observation specifically accounts for the neutral zone (pI 5-8) and can be accounted for by the physicochemical properties of the peptides given by their amino acid composition. The power of OGE separation of proteins and peptides is discussed with a focus on the use of the knowledge about the pI of proteins and peptides that assist the validation of correct identifications together with the retention time of peptides on RPC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15704250     DOI: 10.1002/elps.200410106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  26 in total

1.  Combining isoelectric point-based fractionation, liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry to improve peptide detection and protein identification.

Authors:  Stephanie M Cologna; William K Russell; Peniel J Lim; Gyula Vigh; David H Russell
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 2.  Advances and challenges in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomics profiling for clinical applications.

Authors:  Wei-Jun Qian; Jon M Jacobs; Tao Liu; David G Camp; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Using size exclusion chromatography-RPLC and RPLC-CIEF as two-dimensional separation strategies for protein profiling.

Authors:  David C Simpson; Seonghee Ahn; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic; Bogdan Bogdanov; Heather M Mottaz; Andrey N Vilkov; Gordon A Anderson; Mary S Lipton; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 4.  Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics.

Authors:  Yaoyang Zhang; Bryan R Fonslow; Bing Shan; Moon-Chang Baek; John R Yates
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Increasing proteome coverage with offline RP HPLC coupled to online RP nanoLC-MS.

Authors:  Emine Gokce; Genna L Andrews; Ralph A Dean; David C Muddiman
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.205

6.  Human plasma N-glycoproteome analysis by immunoaffinity subtraction, hydrazide chemistry, and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Wei-Jun Qian; Marina A Gritsenko; David G Camp; Matthew E Monroe; Ronald J Moore; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 7.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of endoscopically collected pancreatic fluid in chronic pancreatitis research.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Linda S Lee; Bechien Wu; Peter A Banks; Hanno Steen; Darwin L Conwell
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Comparison of in-gel protein separation techniques commonly used for fractionation in mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling.

Authors:  Mohieddin Jafari; Vincent Primo; Gary B Smejkal; Eugene V Moskovets; Winston P Kuo; Alexander R Ivanov
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Proteomics: challenges, techniques and possibilities to overcome biological sample complexity.

Authors:  Kondethimmanahalli Chandramouli; Pei-Yuan Qian
Journal:  Hum Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2009-12-08

Review 10.  The proteogenomic path towards biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Tara K Sigdel; Minnie M Sarwal
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2008-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.