Literature DB >> 15703954

Macroscopic and radiological grading of osteoarthritis correlates inadequately with cartilage height and histologically demonstrable damage to cartilage structure.

Andre Saal1, J Gaertner, M Kuehling, Bernd Swoboda, Stefan Klug.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to investigate different methods for determining osteoarthritis-related (OA) cartilaginous changes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human tibial heads were investigated radiologically, macroscopically and microscopically. The height of the hyaline cartilage was measured with the aid of a computerised digital image analysis system.
RESULTS: The comparison of the different evaluation systems revealed, in part, appreciable variations in severity and produced correlations of r=-0.312-0.673. In none of the methods was a linear correlation between the histomorphometrically measured decrease in cartilage height and the increasing grade of OA evident. DISCUSSION: The microscopic scores are superior, since they provide the most precise description of cartilaginous structure. The variation in cartilage height with increasing OA is not a linear process; measurement of the cartilage height alone is not a valid parameter for determining the grade of OA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15703954     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-004-0582-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  18 in total

1.  Histomorphometry of the aging human patella: histologic criteria and controls.

Authors:  F H Gannon; L Sokoloff
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Clinical and roentgenologic study of knee joints with osteophytes.

Authors:  L Danielsson; J Hernborg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1970 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Validity of histopathological grading of articular cartilage from osteoarthritic knee joints.

Authors:  K Ostergaard; C B Andersen; J Petersen; K Bendtzen; D M Salter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Quantification of morphometric changes in murine experimental osteoarthritis using image analysis.

Authors:  A A van Valburg; G J van Osch; P M van der Kraan; W B van den Berg
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Long-term effects of glucosamine sulphate on osteoarthritis progression: a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; R Deroisy; L C Rovati; R L Lee; E Lejeune; O Bruyere; G Giacovelli; Y Henrotin; J E Dacre; C Gossett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Articular cartilage superficial zone collagen birefringence reduced and cartilage thickness increased before surface fibrillation in experimental osteoarthritis.

Authors:  H E Panula; M M Hyttinen; J P Arokoski; T K Långsjö; A Pelttari; I Kiviranta; H J Helminen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Compensation and decompensation of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  K D Brandt
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1993-11

10.  Macroscopically normal cartilage from the human osteoarthritic femoral head. II. Measurement of cartilage thickness and cell density.

Authors:  E Vignon; M Arlot
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.666

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging of osteoarthritis of the peripheral joints].

Authors:  J Zacher; H D Carl; B Swoboda; M Backhaus
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Comparison of cartilage histopathology assessment systems on human knee joints at all stages of osteoarthritis development.

Authors:  C Pauli; R Whiteside; F L Heras; D Nesic; J Koziol; S P Grogan; J Matyas; K P H Pritzker; D D D'Lima; M K Lotz
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  The effects of bone turnover rate on subchondral trabecular bone structure and cartilage damage in the osteoarthritis rat model.

Authors:  Young Hwan Koh; Sung Hwan Hong; Heung Sik Kang; Chin Youb Chung; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Hye Won Chung; Joo Hee Cha; Kyu Ri Son
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Multimodal evaluation of tissue-engineered cartilage.

Authors:  Joseph M Mansour; Jean F Welter
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.553

5.  The Value of SPECT/CT for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  D Zarringam; D B F Saris; J E J Bekkers
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-06-16       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Assessment of Clinical, Tissue, and Cell-Level Metrics Identify Four Biologically Distinct Knee Osteoarthritis Patient Phenotypes.

Authors:  Venkata P Mantripragada; Alexander Csorba; Wesley Bova; Cynthia Boehm; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Jennifer Bullen; Ronald J Midura; George F Muschler
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.117

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.