BACKGROUND:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a validated target in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, but in patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, EGFR targeting agents have displayed modest efficacy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated angiogenesis has been implicated as a mechanism of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. In this multi-institutional phase I/II study we combined an EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib, with an anti-VEGF antibody, bevacizumab. METHODS:Between April 15, 2003, and Jan 27, 2005, patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck were enrolled from seven centres in the USA and were givenerlotinib (150 mg daily) and bevacizumab in escalating dose cohorts. The primary objectives in the phase I and II sections, respectively, were to establish the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of bevacizumab when administered with erlotinib and to establish the proportion of objective responses and time to disease progression. Pretreatment serum and tissues were collected and analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunofluorescence quantitative laser analysis, respectively. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00055913. FINDINGS: In the phase I section of the trial, ten patients were enrolled in three successive cohorts with no dose-limiting toxic effects noted. 46 patients were enrolled in the phase II section of the trial (including three patients from the phase I section) on the highest dose ofbevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks). Two additional patients were accrued beyond the protocol-stipulated 46, leaving a total of 48 patients for the phase II assessment. The most common toxic effects of any grade were rash and diarrhoea (41 and 16 of 48 patients, respectively). Three patients had serious bleeding events of grade 3 or higher. Seven patients had a response, with four showing a complete response allowing rejection of the null hypothesis. Median time of overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were 7.1 months (95% CI 5.7-9.0) and 4.1 months (2.8-4.4), respectively. Higher ratios of tumour-cell phosphorylated VEGF receptor-2 (pVEGFR2) over total VEGFR2 and endothelial-cell pEGFR over total EGFR in pretreatment biopsies were associated with complete response (0.704 vs 0.386, p=0.036 and 0.949 vs 0.332, p=0.036, respectively) and tumour shrinkage (p=0.007 and p=0.008, respectively) in a subset of 11 patients with available tissue. INTERPRETATION: The combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab is well tolerated in recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A few patients seem to derive a sustained benefit and complete responses were associated with expression of putative targets in pretreatment tumour tissue.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a validated target in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, but in patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, EGFR targeting agents have displayed modest efficacy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated angiogenesis has been implicated as a mechanism of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. In this multi-institutional phase I/II study we combined an EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib, with an anti-VEGF antibody, bevacizumab. METHODS: Between April 15, 2003, and Jan 27, 2005, patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck were enrolled from seven centres in the USA and were given erlotinib (150 mg daily) and bevacizumab in escalating dose cohorts. The primary objectives in the phase I and II sections, respectively, were to establish the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of bevacizumab when administered with erlotinib and to establish the proportion of objective responses and time to disease progression. Pretreatment serum and tissues were collected and analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunofluorescence quantitative laser analysis, respectively. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00055913. FINDINGS: In the phase I section of the trial, ten patients were enrolled in three successive cohorts with no dose-limiting toxic effects noted. 46 patients were enrolled in the phase II section of the trial (including three patients from the phase I section) on the highest dose of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks). Two additional patients were accrued beyond the protocol-stipulated 46, leaving a total of 48 patients for the phase II assessment. The most common toxic effects of any grade were rash and diarrhoea (41 and 16 of 48 patients, respectively). Three patients had serious bleeding events of grade 3 or higher. Seven patients had a response, with four showing a complete response allowing rejection of the null hypothesis. Median time of overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were 7.1 months (95% CI 5.7-9.0) and 4.1 months (2.8-4.4), respectively. Higher ratios of tumour-cell phosphorylated VEGF receptor-2 (pVEGFR2) over total VEGFR2 and endothelial-cell pEGFR over total EGFR in pretreatment biopsies were associated with complete response (0.704 vs 0.386, p=0.036 and 0.949 vs 0.332, p=0.036, respectively) and tumour shrinkage (p=0.007 and p=0.008, respectively) in a subset of 11 patients with available tissue. INTERPRETATION: The combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab is well tolerated in recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A few patients seem to derive a sustained benefit and complete responses were associated with expression of putative targets in pretreatment tumour tissue.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A Viloria-Petit; T Crombet; S Jothy; D Hicklin; P Bohlen; J M Schlaeppi; J Rak; R S Kerbel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: F Ciardiello; R Bianco; V Damiano; G Fontanini; R Caputo; G Pomatico; S De Placido; A R Bianco; J Mendelsohn; G Tortora Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Daniel Kedar; Cheryl H Baker; Jerald J Killion; Colin P N Dinney; Isaiah J Fidler Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ezra E W Cohen; Fred Rosen; Walter M Stadler; Wendy Recant; Kerstin Stenson; Dezheng Huo; Everett E Vokes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Denis Soulieres; Neil N Senzer; Everett E Vokes; Manuel Hidalgo; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Lillian L Siu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Fortunato Ciardiello; Roberto Bianco; Roberta Caputo; Rosa Caputo; Vincenzo Damiano; Teresa Troiani; Davide Melisi; Ferdinando De Vita; Sabino De Placido; A Raffaele Bianco; Giampaolo Tortora Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Athanassios Argiris; Shuli Li; Panayiotis Savvides; James P Ohr; Jill Gilbert; Marshall A Levine; Arnab Chakravarti; Missak Haigentz; Nabil F Saba; Chukwuemeka V Ikpeazu; Charles J Schneider; Harlan A Pinto; Arlene A Forastiere; Barbara Burtness Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Athanassios Argiris; Steve C Lee; Trevor Feinstein; Sufi Thomas; Barton F Branstetter; Raja Seethala; Lin Wang; William Gooding; Jennifer R Grandis; Robert L Ferris Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Silvana Papagerakis; Giuseppe Pannone; Li Zheng; Imad About; Nawar Taqi; Nghia P T Nguyen; Margarite Matossian; Blake McAlpin; Angela Santoro; Jonathan McHugh; Mark E Prince; Petros Papagerakis Journal: Exp Cell Res Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 3.905