Literature DB >> 15699647

Evaluation of 45S5 bioactive glass combined as a bone substitute in the reconstruction of critical size calvarial defects in rabbits.

Andrea Moreira-Gonzalez1, Catherine Lobocki, Khaled Barakat, Lee Andrus, Melinda Bradford, Milessa Gilsdorf, Ian T Jackson.   

Abstract

Biomaterial research and tissue engineering have guided new developments in bone replacement. In this study, the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of 45S5 Bioglass (Novabone-C/M, Porex Surg., Newnan, GA), granules as a bone replacement material for large calvarial defects were evaluated. Rabbit periosteal cells were expanded in culture and used in vivo. Alkaline-phosphatase assay, collagen type I, and calcium expression were applied to confirm osteoblast phenotype. In the in vivo phase, a 15-mm diameter critical size calvarial defect was created in rabbits (n = 14). The defect was reconstructed according to four treatment groups: autogenous bone (n = 2), Bioglass alone (n = 2), Bioglass + bone (n = 5), Bioglass + periosteal cells (n = 5). The animals were killed 12 weeks after surgery, and the samples were analyzed. Periosteal cells grew successfully in vitro. Because of their fast proliferation and potential to differentiate into osteoblasts, they were an excellent source of cells for bone tissue engineering. The best ossification was seen when autogenous bone was used (79.4% ossified), whereas only 8.2% of the defect in the Bioglass group showed ossification. Addition of bone or cells to the Bioglass increased the area of ossification to 42.7% and 30.2%, respectively. Defects replaced with Bioglass showed varying degrees of inflammatory reaction because of the intense cell-mediated biodegradation process. Based on these findings, the use of Bioglass granules to repair large craniofacial defects cannot be advised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15699647     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200501000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of an osteostimulative putty in the sheep spine.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Bin Lu; Lei Chen; Jiang Chang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Bone defect healing is induced by collagen sponge/polyglycolic acid.

Authors:  Shirin Toosi; Hojjat Naderi-Meshkin; Fatemeh Kalalinia; Hossein HosseinKhani; Asieh Heirani-Tabasi; Shahrzad Havakhah; Sirous Nekooei; Amir Hossein Jafarian; Fahimeh Rezaie; Mohammad Taghi Peivandi; Hooman Mesgarani; Javad Behravan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Enhanced osteocalcin expression by osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1) exposed to bioactive coating glass (SiO2-CaO-P2O5-MgO-K2O-Na2O system) ions.

Authors:  V G Varanasi; E Saiz; P M Loomer; B Ancheta; N Uritani; S P Ho; A P Tomsia; S J Marshall; G W Marshall
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  The biological effect of cyanoacrylate-combined calcium phosphate in rabbit calvarial defects.

Authors:  Yun-Young Chang; Surangi Dissanayake; Jeong-Ho Yun; Ui-Won Jung; Chang-Sung Kim; Kyeong-Jun Park; Jung-Kiu Chai; Seong-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Critical Size Bone Defect Healing Using Collagen-Calcium Phosphate Bone Graft Materials.

Authors:  William Robert Walsh; Rema A Oliver; Chris Christou; Vedran Lovric; Emma Rose Walsh; Gustavo R Prado; Thomas Haider
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  MagnetOs, Vitoss, and Novabone in a Multi-endpoint Study of Posterolateral Fusion: A True Fusion or Not?

Authors:  Lukas A van Dijk; Florence Barrère-de Groot; Antoine J W P Rosenberg; Matthew Pelletier; Chris Christou; Joost D de Bruijn; William R Walsh
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.723

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.