Literature DB >> 15699569

Optimal molecular profiling of tissue and tissue components: defining the best processing and microdissection methods for biomedical applications.

G Steven Bova1, Isam A Eltoum, John A Kiernan, Gene P Siegal, Andra R Frost, Carolyn J M Best, John W Gillespie, Gloria H Su, Michael R Emmert-Buck.   

Abstract

Isolation of well-preserved pure cell populations is a prerequisite for sound studies of the molecular basis of any tissue-based biological phenomenon. This article reviews current methods for obtaining anatomically specific signals from molecules isolated from tissues, a basic requirement for productive linking of phenotype and genotype. The quality of samples isolated from tissue and used for molecular analysis is often glossed over or omitted from publications, making interpretation and replication of data difficult or impossible. Fortunately, recently developed techniques allow life scientists to better document and control the quality of samples used for a given assay, creating a foundation for improvement in this area. Tissue processing for molecular studies usually involves some or all of the following steps: tissue collection, gross dissection/identification, fixation, processing/embedding, storage/archiving, sectioning, staining, microdissection/annotation, and pure analyte labeling/identification and quantification. We provide a detailed comparison of some current tissue microdissection technologies, and provide detailed example protocols for tissue component handling upstream and downstream from microdissection. We also discuss some of the physical and chemical issues related to optimal tissue processing, and include methods specific to cytology specimens. We encourage each laboratory to use these as a starting point for optimization of their overall process of moving from collected tissue to high quality, appropriately anatomically tagged scientific results. In optimized protocols is a source of inefficiency in current life science research. Improvement in this area will significantly increase life science quality and productivity. The article is divided into introduction, materials, protocols, and notes sections. Because many protocols are covered in each of these sections, information relating to a single protocol is not contiguous. To get the greatest benefit from this article, readers are advised to read through the entire article first, identify protocols appropriate to their laboratory for each step in their workflow, and then reread entries in each section pertaining to each of these single protocols.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15699569     DOI: 10.1385/MB:29:2:119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1073-6085            Impact factor:   2.695


  40 in total

1.  cDNA array hybridization after laser-assisted microdissection from nonneoplastic tissue.

Authors:  Ludger Fink; Stephanie Kohlhoff; Maria Magdalena Stein; Jörg Hänze; Norbert Weissmann; Frank Rose; Ercan Akkayagil; Daniel Manz; Friedrich Grimminger; Werner Seeger; Rainer Maria Bohle
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Evaluation of non-formalin tissue fixation for molecular profiling studies.

Authors:  John W Gillespie; Carolyn J M Best; Verena E Bichsel; Kristina A Cole; Susan F Greenhut; Stephen M Hewitt; Mamoun Ahram; Yvonne B Gathright; Maria J Merino; Robert L Strausberg; Jonathan I Epstein; Stanley R Hamilton; Gallya Gannot; Galina V Baibakova; Valerie S Calvert; Michael J Flaig; Rodrigo F Chuaqui; Judi C Herring; John Pfeifer; Emmanuel F Petricoin; W Marston Linehan; Paul H Duray; G Steven Bova; Michael R Emmert-Buck
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Use of laser capture microdissection to selectively obtain distinct populations of cells for proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Rachel A Craven; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 4.  Microdissection of histologic sections: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Isam A Eltoum; Gene P Siegal; Andra R Frost
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.875

5.  High quality RNA retrieved from samples obtained by using LMPC (laser microdissection and pressure catapulting) technology.

Authors:  Renate Burgemeister; Rainer Gangnus; Beate Haar; Karin Schütze; Ulrich Sauer
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  A simple, precise and economical microdissection technique for analysis of genomic DNA from archival tissue sections.

Authors:  J Y Lee; S M Dong; S Y Kim; N J Yoo; S H Lee; W S Park
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Microdissection and polymerase chain reaction amplification of genomic DNA from histological tissue sections.

Authors:  C A Moskaluk; S E Kern
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Extraction and analysis of diagnostically useful proteins from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections.

Authors:  K Ikeda; T Monden; T Kanoh; M Tsujie; H Izawa; A Haba; T Ohnishi; M Sekimoto; N Tomita; H Shiozaki; M Monden
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  Effects of formalin fixation and prolonged block storage on detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in liver tissue.

Authors:  R B Guerrero; K P Batts; D J Brandhagen; J J Germer; R G Perez; D H Persing
Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol       Date:  1997-10

10.  Immuno-LCM: laser capture microdissection of immunostained frozen sections for mRNA analysis.

Authors:  F Fend; M R Emmert-Buck; R Chuaqui; K Cole; J Lee; L A Liotta; M Raffeld
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.307

View more
  8 in total

1.  Improved immunohistochemical detection of phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinases in the injured rat optic nerve head.

Authors:  Teresa Mammone; Glyn Chidlow; Robert J Casson; John P M Wood
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 2.  Beyond laser microdissection technology: follow the yellow brick road for cancer research.

Authors:  Luc G Legres; Anne Janin; Christophe Masselon; Philippe Bertheau
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Quantitative RT-PCR gene expression analysis of laser microdissected tissue samples.

Authors:  Heidi S Erickson; Paul S Albert; John W Gillespie; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; W Marston Linehan; Peter A Pinto; Rodrigo F Chuaqui; Michael R Emmert-Buck
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Simplified and versatile method for isolation of high-quality RNA from pancreas.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Maisam Abu-El-Haija; Marwa Abu-El-Haija; Tatiana Rokhlina; Aliye Uc
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.993

5.  Tissue integrity and RNA quality of laser microdissected phloem of potato.

Authors:  Yueyue Yu; C C Lashbrook; David J Hannapel
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.540

6.  Protein Markers Associated with an ALDH Sub-Population in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Rui Yang; Xinhua Liu; Smathorn Thakolwiboon; Jianhui Zhu; Xiucong Pei; Mingrui An; Zhijing Tan; David M Lubman
Journal:  J Proteomics Bioinform       Date:  2016-10-03

7.  Assessment role of total phenols and flavonoids extracted from Pleurotus columbinus mushroom on the premature ovarian failure induced by chemotherapy in rats.

Authors:  Amal I Hassan; Mona A M Ghoneim; Manal G Mahmoud; Mohsen S Asker
Journal:  J Genet Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 8.  Imaging aspects of cardiovascular disease at the cell and molecular level.

Authors:  Douglas J Taatjes; Marilyn P Wadsworth; Anthony S Quinn; Jacob H Rand; Edwin G Bovill; Burton E Sobel
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.304

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.