Literature DB >> 15690988

Forward and backward recurrence times and length biased sampling: age specific models.

Marvin Zelen1.   

Abstract

Consider a chronic disease process which is beginning to be observed at a point in chronological time. The backward recurrence and forward recurrence times are defined for prevalent cases as the time with disease and the time to leave the disease state, respectively, where the reference point is the point in time at which the disease process is being observed. In this setting the incidence of disease affects the recurrence time distributions. In addition, the survival of prevalent cases will tend to be greater than the population with disease due to length biased sampling. A similar problem arises in models for the early detection of disease. In this case the backward recurrence time is how long an individual has had disease before detection and the forward recurrence time is the time gained by early diagnosis, i.e., until the disease becomes clinical by exhibiting signs or symptoms. In these examples the incidence of disease may be age related resulting in a non-stationary process. The resulting recurrence time distributions are derived as well as some generalization of length-biased sampling.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15690988     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-004-4770-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  22 in total

1.  Nonparametric tests for right-censored data with biased sampling.

Authors:  Jing Ning; Jing Qin; Yu Shen
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.488

2.  A maximum pseudo-profile likelihood estimator for the Cox model under length-biased sampling.

Authors:  Chiung-Yu Huang; Jing Qin; Dean A Follmann
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  Likelihood approaches for the invariant density ratio model with biased-sampling data.

Authors:  Yu Shen; Jing Ning; Jing Qin
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.445

4.  The current duration design for estimating the time to pregnancy distribution: a nonparametric Bayesian perspective.

Authors:  Dario Gasbarra; Elja Arjas; Aki Vehtari; Rémy Slama; Niels Keiding
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 5.  Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer.

Authors:  Melissa M Smarr; Katherine J Sapra; Alison Gemmill; Linda G Kahn; Lauren A Wise; Courtney D Lynch; Pam Factor-Litvak; Sunni L Mumford; Niels E Skakkebaek; Rémy Slama; Danelle T Lobdell; Joseph B Stanford; Tina Kold Jensen; Elizabeth Heger Boyle; Michael L Eisenberg; Paul J Turek; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie E Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Proportional hazards model with varying coefficients for length-biased data.

Authors:  Feipeng Zhang; Xuerong Chen; Yong Zhou
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 7.  Follow-up in patients with low-risk cutaneous melanoma: is it worth it?

Authors:  Ulrike Leiter; Thomas Eigentler; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-12-04

8.  Analyzing Length-biased Data with Semiparametric Transformation and Accelerated Failure Time Models.

Authors:  Yu Shen; Jing Ning; Jing Qin
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Imputation for semiparametric transformation models with biased-sampling data.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Jing Qin; Yu Shen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Beta prime regression with application to risky behavior frequency screening.

Authors:  Alexander Tulupyev; Alena Suvorova; Jennifer Sousa; Daniel Zelterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.