Literature DB >> 15690502

Interactions between hemodynamic responses to scanner acoustic noise and auditory stimuli in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Dave R M Langers1, Pim Van Dijk, Walter H Backes.   

Abstract

In functional MRI experiments on the central auditory system, activation caused by acoustic scanner noise is a dominating factor that partially masks the hemodynamic response signals to sound stimuli of interest. In this study, the nonlinear interaction between auditory responses to single scans and those to tone stimuli was investigated. By using irregular acquisition repetition times and quasi-random stimulus timings, the brain responses to pure tone stimuli were analyzed, as well as their interaction with scanner noise. The tone frequencies were chosen to match either the fundamental frequency of the scanner noise (730 Hz) or a region with little spectral power (4.70 kHz). The hemodynamic responses could be characterized by amplitudes of 1.3% and a time-to-peak of 4.0-4.5 sec in the absence of scanner noise. Interaction effects due to a single previous scan typically decreased the response magnitudes to 0.9%. The functional shape of the interaction was analyzed and could be described by a highly separable, dominantly symmetric interaction function that fairly agreed with a low-order Volterra expansion of a simple nonlinear model. Interactions were stronger and more complex in shape when the spectral content of the tone stimulus and the scanner noise were more similar. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15690502     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  16 in total

1.  Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources.

Authors:  O Olulade; S Hu; J Gonzalez-Castillo; G G Tamer; W-M Luh; J L Ulmer; T M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Signal fluctuations induced by non-T1-related confounds in variable TR fMRI experiments.

Authors:  Shuowen Hu; Olumide Olulade; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Characterizing response to elemental unit of acoustic imaging noise: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Unbiased group-level statistical assessment of independent component maps by means of automated retrospective matching.

Authors:  Dave R M Langers
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Effects of scanner acoustic noise on intrinsic brain activity during auditory stimulation.

Authors:  Natalia Yakunina; Eun Kyoung Kang; Tae Su Kim; Ji-Hoon Min; Sam Soo Kim; Eui-Cheol Nam
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  How challenges in auditory fMRI led to general advancements for the field.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Population receptive field estimates of human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jessica M Thomas; Elizabeth Huber; G Christopher Stecker; Geoffrey M Boynton; Melissa Saenz; Ione Fine
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Human brain activation during phonation and exhalation: common volitional control for two upper airway functions.

Authors:  Torrey M J Loucks; Christopher J Poletto; Kristina Simonyan; Catherine L Reynolds; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.