Literature DB >> 15689610

Evaluation of screening strategies for improving oral cancer mortality: a Cochrane systematic review.

Omar Kujan1, Anne-Marie Glenny, John Duxbury, Nalin Thakker, Philip Sloan.   

Abstract

Worldwide, oral cancer has one of the lowest survival rates. It is well recognized that survival rates are improved if the disease is treated in its early stages. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of screening methods in decreasing the mortality of oral cancer. A systematic review on the effectiveness of oral cancer screening was performed using all publications in MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, EMBASE, and Cochrane CCTR between 1966 and September 2002. The evidence was evaluated using the standardized methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. The search strategy revealed 1,389 citations. From these, 100 potentially relevant articles were selected for review. However, only one randomized controlled study using visual examination as the method for screening fulfilled the selection criteria. Given the limitation of evidence and the potential methodological weakness in the included study, it is valid to say that there is no evidence to recommend inclusion or exclusion of screening programs for oral cancer using visual examination in the general population. In addition, no robust evidence exists that indicates whether other screening methods including toluidine blue, fluorescence imaging, or brush biopsy are either beneficial or harmful. Further high-quality studies to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of screening are required. Additional investigations aimed at elucidating the natural history of oral cancer and evaluating the effectiveness of prevention and opportunistic screening in high-risk groups are needed. A greater understanding of the genetic basis of oral cancer is an essential prerequisite to the development of molecular markers for screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15689610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Educ        ISSN: 0022-0337            Impact factor:   2.264


  22 in total

1.  Total diagnostic delay in oral cancer may be related to advanced disease stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Jennifer L Cleveland; Gina Thornton-Evans
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.267

Review 2.  [Oral cytology: historical development, current status, and perspectives].

Authors:  M Hullmann; T E Reichert; R Dahse; F von Eggeling; H Pistner; H Kosmehl; O Driemel
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

3.  Evaluating a Web-Based Educational Module on Oral Cancer Examination Based on a Behavioral Framework.

Authors:  Alvin G Wee; Lani M Zimmerman; Carol H Pullen; Carl M Allen; Paul M Lambert; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Role of Poor Oral Hygiene in Causation of Oral Cancer-a Review of Literature.

Authors:  Rachit Mathur; Hitesh Rajendra Singhavi; Akshat Malik; Sudhir Nair; Pankaj Chaturvedi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-12-07

Review 5.  Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer.

Authors:  Paul Brocklehurst; Omar Kujan; Lucy A O'Malley; Graham Ogden; Simon Shepherd; Anne-Marie Glenny
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-11-19

6.  Knowledge and Practice of Oral Cancer Screening in Teaching Faculty-Comparison of Specialty and Year of Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Shintaro Kogi; John DaSilva; Yusuke Mikasa; Cliff Lee; Shigemi Ishikawa-Nagai; Qian Yang; Hidemichi Kihara; Ryosuke Abe; Hiroyuki Yamada
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Oral cancer: a major and growing public health problem towards a national policy of prevention and early detection in Tunisia.

Authors:  Dorsaf Touil; Lamia Oualha; Nabiha Douki
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-12-01

8.  Clinical oral examinations may not be predictive of dysplasia or oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer L Cleveland; Valerie A Robison
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 5.267

9.  Visual evaluation of the larynx and hypopharynx during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a safety and feasibility study.

Authors:  Shanlee M Stevens; Eric A Johnson; Patrick R Pfau; Seth H Dailey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Transepithelial Brush Biopsy - Oral CDx® - A Noninvasive Method for the Early Detection of Precancerous and Cancerous Lesions.

Authors:  Casparis S; Borm J M; Tomic M A; Burkhardt A; Locher M C
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.