Literature DB >> 15682273

The power to detect genetic linkage for quantitative traits in the Utah CEPH pedigrees.

Alka Malhotra1,2, Kevin Cromer3, Mark F Leppert3, Sandra J Hasstedt3.   

Abstract

Quantitative trait phenotypes and linked marker genotypes were simulated for a range of models with different sets of assumptions based on displacement, prevalence, and heritability of the trait in 30 Utah Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH) families. The gain in power by the addition of 15 families was also estimated by extrapolation. Power was evaluated using both parametric single locus (PSL) models and variance components (VC) methods for two situations: (1) a single marker with 75% heterozygosity and a recombination fraction of 0.05, and (2) a fully informative marker as an approximation to multipoint analysis. When the simulation and analysis models were both dominant with the same prevalence, power > or =80% for lod >3 was estimated when quantitative trait locus variance was > or =40% with a displacement of 2.5 or 3. Power was 5-15% lower for recessive models compared to dominant models. With the addition of 15 families, an average increase in power of 17% and 22% was estimated for the dominant and recessive models, respectively. In PSL analyses, power was estimated at < or =20% when the dominance was misspecified. This investigation delineates parameter conditions under which this unique sample affords adequate power to detect linkage using both PSL and VC methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15682273     DOI: 10.1007/s10038-004-0222-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1434-5161            Impact factor:   3.172


  20 in total

1.  Quantitative trait locus mapping using human pedigrees.

Authors:  J Blangero; J T Williams; L Almasy
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 0.553

2.  Effect of misspecification of gene frequency on the two-point LOD score.

Authors:  D K Pal; M Durner; D A Greenberg
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Power of multipoint identity-by-descent methods to detect linkage using variance component models.

Authors:  C T Ekstrøm
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Analytic power calculation for QTL linkage analysis of small pedigrees.

Authors:  F V Rijsdijk; J K Hewitt; P C Sham
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Centre d'etude du polymorphisme humain (CEPH): collaborative genetic mapping of the human genome.

Authors:  J Dausset; H Cann; D Cohen; M Lathrop; J M Lalouel; R White
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 6.  Genetic analysis of simulated oligogenic traits in nuclear and extended pedigrees: summary of GAW10 contributions.

Authors:  E M Wijsman; C I Amos
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus.

Authors:  J K Haseman; R C Elston
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Evolving methods in genetic epidemiology. II. Genetic linkage from an epidemiologic perspective.

Authors:  N Risch
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Estimating the power of a proposed linkage study: a practical computer simulation approach.

Authors:  M Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  A collection of ordered tetranucleotide-repeat markers from the human genome. The Utah Marker Development Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  2 in total

1.  Causal and Candidate Gene Variants in a Large Cohort of Women With Primary Ovarian Insufficiency.

Authors:  Bushra Gorsi; Edgar Hernandez; Marvin Barry Moore; Mika Moriwaki; Clement Y Chow; Emily Coelho; Elaine Taylor; Claire Lu; Amanda Walker; Philippe Touraine; Lawrence M Nelson; Amber R Cooper; Elaine R Mardis; Aleksander Rajkovic; Mark Yandell; Corrine K Welt
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Large, three-generation human families reveal post-zygotic mosaicism and variability in germline mutation accumulation.

Authors:  Thomas A Sasani; Brent S Pedersen; Ziyue Gao; Lisa Baird; Molly Przeworski; Lynn B Jorde; Aaron R Quinlan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 8.140

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.