Literature DB >> 15681669

Clinical ethics, information, and communication: review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committee.

R Førde1, I H Vandvik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To summarise the types of case brought to the Clinical Ethics Committee of the National Hospital of Norway from 1996 to 2002 and to describe and discuss to what extent issues of information/communication have been involved in the ethical problems.
DESIGN: Systematic review of case reports.
FINDINGS: Of the 31 case discussions, (20 prospective, 11 retrospective), 19 cases concerned treatment of children. Twenty cases concerned ethical problems related to withholding/withdrawing of treatment. In 25 cases aspects of information/communication were involved in the ethical problem, either explicitly (n = 3) or implicitly (n = 22).
CONCLUSION: Problems related to information/communication may underlie a classic ethical problem. Identification of these "hidden" problems may be important for the analysis, and hence, the solution to the ethical dilemma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15681669      PMCID: PMC1734089          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.003954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  12 in total

1.  Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too.

Authors:  A W Wu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

Review 2.  Withdrawing life support and resolution of conflict with families.

Authors:  Jenny Way; Anthony L Back; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-07

3.  The communication atmosphere between physician colleagues: competitive perfectionism or supportive dialogue? A Norwegian study.

Authors:  V Akre; E Falkum; B O Hoftvedt; O G Aasland
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Clinical ethics consultation: Godsend or "God squad"?

Authors:  M Siegler; P A Singer
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  What triggers requests for ethics consultations?

Authors:  G DuVal; L Sartorius; B Clarridge; G Gensler; M Danis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  L F Degner; L J Kristjanson; D Bowman; J A Sloan; K C Carriere; J O'Neil; B Bilodeau; P Watson; B Mueller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Why doctors don't disclose uncertainty.

Authors:  J Katz
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 8.  Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.

Authors:  A Robinson; R Thomson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

9.  Should cancer patients be informed about their diagnosis and prognosis? Future doctors and lawyers differ.

Authors:  Bernice S Elger; T W Harding
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Evaluation of a medical ethics consultation service: opinions of patients and health care providers.

Authors:  J A McClung; R S Kamer; M DeLuca; H J Barber
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  19 in total

1.  Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors.

Authors:  S A Hurst; A Perrier; R Pegoraro; S Reiter-Theil; R Forde; A-M Slowther; E Garrett-Mayer; M Danis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Clinicians' evaluation of clinical ethics consultations in Norway: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Reidun Førde; Reidar Pedersen; Victoria Akre
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-10-02

3.  Physicians' access to ethics support services in four European countries.

Authors:  Samia A Hurst; Stella Reiter-Theil; Arnaud Perrier; Reidun Forde; Anne-Marie Slowther; Renzo Pegoraro; Marion Danis
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12

4.  HEC member perspectives on the case analysis process: a qualitative multi-site study.

Authors:  Eric Racine
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-09

5.  Mandatory ethics consultation policy.

Authors:  Megan E Romano; Staffan B Wahlander; Barbara H Lang; Guohua Li; Kenneth M Prager
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Discussing End-of-Life Decisions in a Clinical Ethics Committee: An Interview Study of Norwegian Doctors' Experience.

Authors:  Marianne K Bahus; Reidun Førde
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-09

7.  Do organizational and clinical ethics in a hospital setting need different venues?

Authors:  Reidun Førde; Thor Willy Ruud Hansen
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-06

8.  What Ethical Issues Really Arise in Practice at an Academic Medical Center? A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Clinical Ethics Consultations from 2008 to 2013.

Authors:  Katherine Wasson; Emily Anderson; Erika Hagstrom; Michael McCarthy; Kayhan Parsi; Mark Kuczewski
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-09

9.  Five-year experience of clinical ethics consultations in a pediatric teaching hospital.

Authors:  Jürg C Streuli; Georg Staubli; Marlis Pfändler-Poletti; Ruth Baumann-Hölzle; Jörg Ersch
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  [Ethic charter of the German Society for the Study of Pain (DGSS)].

Authors:  S Reiter-Theil; T Graf-Baumann; K Kutzer; H C Müller-Busch; R Stutzki; H C Traue; A Willweber-Strumpf; M Zimmermann; M Zenz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.