Literature DB >> 25999295

Analysis of accelerated failure time data with dependent censoring using auxiliary variables via nonparametric multiple imputation.

Chiu-Hsieh Hsu1,2, Jeremy M G Taylor3, Chengcheng Hu1,2.   

Abstract

We consider the situation of estimating the marginal survival distribution from censored data subject to dependent censoring using auxiliary variables. We had previously developed a nonparametric multiple imputation approach. The method used two working proportional hazards (PH) models, one for the event times and the other for the censoring times, to define a nearest neighbor imputing risk set. This risk set was then used to impute failure times for censored observations. Here, we adapt the method to the situation where the event and censoring times follow accelerated failure time models and propose to use the Buckley-James estimator as the two working models. Besides studying the performances of the proposed method, we also compare the proposed method with two popular methods for handling dependent censoring through the use of auxiliary variables, inverse probability of censoring weighted and parametric multiple imputation methods, to shed light on the use of them. In a simulation study with time-independent auxiliary variables, we show that all approaches can reduce bias due to dependent censoring. The proposed method is robust to misspecification of either one of the two working models and their link function. This indicates that a working proportional hazards model is preferred because it is more cumbersome to fit an accelerated failure time model. In contrast, the inverse probability of censoring weighted method is not robust to misspecification of the link function of the censoring time model. The parametric imputation methods rely on the specification of the event time model. The approaches are applied to a prostate cancer dataset.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Buckley-James estimator; Cox proportional hazards model; accelerated failure time; auxiliary variables; multiple imputation; nearest neighbor

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25999295      PMCID: PMC5863093          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  A multiple imputation approach to regression analysis for doubly censored data with application to AIDS studies.

Authors:  W Pan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Correcting for noncompliance and dependent censoring in an AIDS Clinical Trial with inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) log-rank tests.

Authors:  J M Robins; D M Finkelstein
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The joint modeling of a longitudinal disease progression marker and the failure time process in the presence of cure.

Authors:  Ngayee J Law; Jeremy M G Taylor; Howard Sandler
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  The accelerated failure time model: a useful alternative to the Cox regression model in survival analysis.

Authors:  L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A robust weighted Kaplan-Meier approach for data with dependent censoring using linear combinations of prognostic covariates.

Authors:  Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Survival analysis using auxiliary variables via non-parametric multiple imputation.

Authors:  Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Jeremy M G Taylor; Susan Murray; Daniel Commenges
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Applications of multiple imputation to the analysis of censored regression data.

Authors:  G C Wei; M A Tanner
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A multiple imputation method for sensitivity analyses of time-to-event data with possibly informative censoring.

Authors:  Yue Zhao; Amy H Herring; Haibo Zhou; Mirza W Ali; Gary G Koch
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  Individualized predictions of disease progression following radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Menggang Yu; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Relaxing the independent censoring assumption in the Cox proportional hazards model using multiple imputation.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Ian R White; Shaun Seaman; Hannah Evans; Kathy Baisley; James Carpenter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.373

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Survival analysis of thalassemia major patients using Cox, Gompertz proportional hazard and Weibull accelerated failure time models.

Authors:  Enayatollah Bakhshi; Reza Ali Akbari Khoei; Azita Azarkeivan; Maryam Kooshesh; Akbar Biglarian
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-12-17

2.  Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods.

Authors:  Tim P Morris; Ian R White; Michael J Crowther
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.497

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.