OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter treatment of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) associated with patent foramen ovale (PFO). BACKGROUND: Patients with both ASA and PFO are at high risk for recurrent paradoxical embolism. METHODS: The procedural, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes of 141 patients with ASA + PFO and > or =1 paradoxical embolic event undergoing transcatheter treatment were compared with 220 patients with PFO alone. RESULTS: Device success (ASA + PFO, 99.3%; PFO alone, 99.5%; p = 0.75) and procedural complications (ASA + PFO, 0.7%; PFO alone, 3.2%; p = 0.12) were similar in both groups. Maximal atrial septal excursion in patients with ASA + PFO decreased from 16 +/- 4 mm before to 4 +/- 3 mm after the intervention (p < 0.0001). At 6 months follow-up, right-to-left shunt was abolished in 120 (86%) patients with ASA + PFO, compared to 187 (85%) patients with PFO alone (p = 0.80). Freedom from recurrent transient ischemic attack, stroke, and peripheral embolism at 4 years was 95% (ASA + PFO) and 94% (PFO alone, p = 0.70), respectively. A residual right-to-left shunt after the intervention was the only predictor for recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 6.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 36.9, p < 0.03) in patients with ASA + PFO. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter treatment of ASA + PFO is safe and effective in patients with paradoxical embolism. The procedure effectively abolishes right-to-left shunt and decreases atrial septal mobility. Long-term prevention of recurrent events appears favorable when compared to patients with PFO alone.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter treatment of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) associated with patent foramen ovale (PFO). BACKGROUND:Patients with both ASA and PFO are at high risk for recurrent paradoxical embolism. METHODS: The procedural, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes of 141 patients with ASA + PFO and > or =1 paradoxical embolic event undergoing transcatheter treatment were compared with 220 patients with PFO alone. RESULTS: Device success (ASA + PFO, 99.3%; PFO alone, 99.5%; p = 0.75) and procedural complications (ASA + PFO, 0.7%; PFO alone, 3.2%; p = 0.12) were similar in both groups. Maximal atrial septal excursion in patients with ASA + PFO decreased from 16 +/- 4 mm before to 4 +/- 3 mm after the intervention (p < 0.0001). At 6 months follow-up, right-to-left shunt was abolished in 120 (86%) patients with ASA + PFO, compared to 187 (85%) patients with PFO alone (p = 0.80). Freedom from recurrent transient ischemic attack, stroke, and peripheral embolism at 4 years was 95% (ASA + PFO) and 94% (PFO alone, p = 0.70), respectively. A residual right-to-left shunt after the intervention was the only predictor for recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 6.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 36.9, p < 0.03) in patients with ASA + PFO. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter treatment of ASA + PFO is safe and effective in patients with paradoxical embolism. The procedure effectively abolishes right-to-left shunt and decreases atrial septal mobility. Long-term prevention of recurrent events appears favorable when compared to patients with PFO alone.
Authors: Christoph Weber; Michael Weber; Okan Ekinci; Thomas Neumann; Anja Deetjen; Andreas Rolf; Gerhard Adam; Christian W Hamm; Thorsten Dill Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-06-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jochen Wöhrle; Bernard Bertrand; Lars Søndergaard; Mark Turner; Werner Scholtz; Réda Ibrahim; François Bourlon Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 5.460