Literature DB >> 18173960

Cryptogenic stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale.

Jeffrey L Saver1.   

Abstract

Paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a commonly identified potential mechanism of ischemic stroke, especially in young patients. The recurrent stroke rate among young cryptogenic stroke patients with a PFO is modest, but higher than normal for their age. Co-existing atrial septal aneurysm is a substantial, and the only definite, potentiator of stroke risk in patients with PFO, but PFO size, degree of functional shunting, and co-existing hypercoagulable state likely are additional risk factors. Pelvic CT and magnetic resonance venography have improved our ability to detect source venous thromboemboli and underlie new management strategies. Treatment strategies for PFOs in ischemic stroke patients include antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, surgical closure, or percutaneous closure devices. The completion of ongoing, randomized clinical trials comparing percutaneous closure devices with medical management is likely to be hastened by the recent withdrawal of humanitarian device exemption approvals, and is urgently needed to clarify if the risks of invasive endovascular device placement are outweighed by a long-term reduction in recurrent vascular events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18173960     DOI: 10.1007/s11883-007-0039-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep        ISSN: 1523-3804            Impact factor:   5.113


  32 in total

1.  Closure of patent foramen ovale after cryptogenic stroke.

Authors:  Jochen Wöhrle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Patent foramen ovale and stroke: what we do and don't know.

Authors:  Doojin Kim; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Rev Neurol Dis       Date:  2005

3.  Is surgical closure of patent foramen ovale the gold standard for treating interatrial shunts? An echocardiographic follow-up study.

Authors:  Birke Schneider; Rudolf Bauer
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Patent foramen ovale: innocent or guilty? Evidence from a prospective population-based study.

Authors:  Irene Meissner; Bijoy K Khandheria; John A Heit; George W Petty; Sheldon G Sheps; Gary L Schwartz; Jack P Whisnant; David O Wiebers; Jody L Covalt; Tanya M Petterson; Teresa J H Christianson; Yoram Agmon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Paradoxical embolism. Diagnosis during life.

Authors:  S G Meister; W Grossman; L Dexter; J E Dalen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both.

Authors:  J L Mas; C Arquizan; C Lamy; M Zuber; L Cabanes; G Derumeaux; J Coste
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Increased pelvic vein thrombi in cryptogenic stroke: results of the Paradoxical Emboli from Large Veins in Ischemic Stroke (PELVIS) study.

Authors:  Steven C Cramer; Guy Rordorf; Jeffrey H Maki; Larry A Kramer; James C Grotta; W Scott Burgin; Judith A Hinchey; Curtis Benesch; Karen L Furie; Helmi L Lutsep; Ellen Kelly; W T Longstreth
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Comparison of medical treatment with percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Authors:  Stephan Windecker; Andreas Wahl; Krassen Nedeltchev; Marcel Arnold; Markus Schwerzmann; Christian Seiler; Heinrich P Mattle; Bernhard Meier
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Ischemic stroke during sexual intercourse: a report of 4 cases in persons with patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Kyra Becker; Elaine Skalabrin; Danial Hallam; Edward Gill
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2004-07

10.  Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutation may predispose to paradoxical embolism in subjects with patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Vesa Karttunen; Leena Hiltunen; Vesa Rasi; Elina Vahtera; Matti Hillbom
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.276

View more
  6 in total

1.  Prediction of cardioembolic, arterial, and lacunar causes of cryptogenic stroke by gene expression and infarct location.

Authors:  Glen C Jickling; Boryana Stamova; Bradley P Ander; Xinhua Zhan; Dazhi Liu; Shara-Mae Sison; Piero Verro; Frank R Sharp
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke: An updated meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Babikir Kheiri; Ahmed Abdalla; Mohammed Osman; Sahar Ahmed; Mustafa Hassan; Ghassan Bachuwa
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Ovarian Cancer Presenting as Cryptogenic Stroke from Patent Foramen Ovale.

Authors:  Bindu R Potugari; Priyanka Priyanka; Sarah D Komanapalli; Richard J Mercier
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2019-07-19

Review 4.  Role of PFO Closure in Ischemic Stroke Prevention.

Authors:  Nicholas D Osteraas; Alejandro Vargas; Laurel Cherian; Sarah Song
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-14

Review 5.  The diagnostic iter of patent foramen ovale in migraine patients: an update.

Authors:  William Liboni; Filippo Molinari; Amedeo Chiribiri; Gianni Allais; Ornella Mana; Emanuela Negri; Gianfranco Grippi; Massimiliano Giacobbe; Sergio Badalamenti; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Characteristics and analysis of right-to-left shunt-related dizziness in patients without hypoxemia.

Authors:  Liming Cao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 1.671

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.