Literature DB >> 15680703

Operculoinsular cortex encodes pain intensity at the earliest stages of cortical processing as indicated by amplitude of laser-evoked potentials in humans.

G D Iannetti1, L Zambreanu, G Cruccu, I Tracey.   

Abstract

Converging evidence from different functional imaging studies indicates that the intensity of activation of different nociceptive areas (including the operculoinsular cortex, the primary somatosensory cortex, and the anterior cingulate gyrus) correlates with perceived pain intensity in the human brain. Brief radiant laser pulses excite selectively Adelta and C nociceptors in the superficial skin layers, provide a purely nociceptive input, and evoke brain potentials (laser-evoked potentials, LEPs) that are commonly used to assess nociceptive pathways in physiological and clinical studies. Adelta-related LEPs are constituted of different components. The earliest is a lateralised, small negative component (N1) which could be generated by the operculoinsular cortex. The major negative component (N2) seems to be mainly the result of activation in the bilateral operculoinsular cortices and contralateral primary somatosensory cortex, and it is followed by a positive component (P2) probably generated by the cingulate gyrus. Currently, early and late LEP components are considered to be differentially sensitive to the subjective variability of pain perception: the late N2-P2 complex strongly correlates with perceived pain, whereas the early N1 component is thought to be a pre-perceptual sensory response. To obtain physiological information on the roles of the pain-related brain areas in healthy humans, we examined the relationship between perceived pain intensity and latency and amplitude of the early (N1) and late (N2, P2) LEP components. We found that the amplitude of the N1 component correlated significantly with the subjective pain ratings, both within and between subjects. Furthermore, we showed that the N2 and P2 late LEP components are differentially sensitive to the perceived sensation, and demonstrated that the N2 component mainly explains the previously described correlation between perceived pain and the amplitude of the N2-P2 vertex complex of LEPs. Our findings confirm the notion that pain intensity processing is distributed over several brain areas, and suggest that the intensity coding of a noxious stimulus occurs already at the earliest stage of perception processing, in the operculoinsular region and, possibly, the primary somatosensory area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15680703     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  65 in total

1.  BOLD responses in somatosensory cortices better reflect heat sensation than pain.

Authors:  Eric A Moulton; Gautam Pendse; Lino R Becerra; David Borsook
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Multiple somatotopic representations of heat and mechanical pain in the operculo-insular cortex: a high-resolution fMRI study.

Authors:  Ulf Baumgärtner; Gian Domenico Iannetti; Laura Zambreanu; Peter Stoeter; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Irene Tracey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural correlates of heat-evoked pain memory in humans.

Authors:  Liping Wang; Peng Gui; Lei Li; Yixuan Ku; Mark Bodner; Gaojie Fan; Yong-Di Zhou; Xiao-Wei Dong
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Similar nociceptive afferents mediate psychophysical and electrophysiological responses to heat stimulation of glabrous and hairy skin in humans.

Authors:  G D Iannetti; L Zambreanu; I Tracey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Predictability modulates the anticipation and perception of pain in both self and others.

Authors:  Weiwei Peng; Xiaoxuan Huang; Yang Liu; Fang Cui
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Unique, common, and interacting cortical correlates of thirst and pain.

Authors:  Michael J Farrell; Gary F Egan; Frank Zamarripa; Robert Shade; John Blair-West; Peter Fox; Derek A Denton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Determinants of laser-evoked EEG responses: pain perception or stimulus saliency?

Authors:  G D Iannetti; N P Hughes; M C Lee; A Mouraux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  The perception of pain and its management in disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Francesca Pistoia; Simona Sacco; Marco Sarà; Antonio Carolei
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-11

9.  Somatosensory spatial attention modulates amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter of laser-evoked brain potentials.

Authors:  Marcel Franz; Moritz M Nickel; Alexander Ritter; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Contact heat-evoked potentials as a useful means in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Bingdi Xie; Xiaowen Li; Yuanrong Yao
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.