Literature DB >> 24584633

Contact heat-evoked potentials as a useful means in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Chao Zhang1, Bingdi Xie, Xiaowen Li, Yuanrong Yao.   

Abstract

Few objective methods have been utilized to identify the small myelinated fiber impairment causing neuropathic pain in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). In this study, contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) were applied to study the nociceptive pathway in GBS. Sixty GBS patients and fifty healthy controls were enrolled. The 60 GBS patients were divided into two subgroups presenting with or without subjective lower limb paresthesia (21/39). CHEPs were recorded at Cz and Pz with a peak thermal stimuli of 47 °C applied to the skin of the leg above the internal malleolus (AIM) and of the waist at the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) level. The N2 latency and N2-P2 amplitude of CHEPs were compared. When the skin of the leg AIM was stimulated, the N2 latency was significantly postponed (425.23 ± 28.66 vs. 402.30 ± 19.48 ms, P < 0.05) and the N2-P2 amplitude significantly decreased in GBS patients as compared to controls (32.71 ± 7.49 vs. 42.77 ± 8.71 μV, P < 0.05). Slower nerve conduction velocity was observed in GBS patients (11.84 ± 1.45 vs. 13.28 ± 0.66 ms, P < 0.05). However, no differences in N2 latency or N2-P2 amplitude were detected between the two subgroups of GBS patients with or without subjective lower limb paresthesia (P all >0.05). Moreover, there were no differences in N2 latency and N2-P2 amplitude among different groups when the waist was stimulated at the ASIS level. Our study suggested that CHEPs could be utilized as an objective and non-invasive tool to detect small myelinated fiber damage in GBS patients, especially for those without subjective paresthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24584633     DOI: 10.1007/s10072-014-1682-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Sci        ISSN: 1590-1874            Impact factor:   3.307


  21 in total

1.  Contact heat evoked potentials as a valid means to study nociceptive pathways in human subjects.

Authors:  A C Chen; D M Niddam; L Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Yuki; Hans-Peter Hartung
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Supportive care for patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Richard A C Hughes; Eelco F M Wijdicks; Estelle Benson; David R Cornblath; Angelika F Hahn; Jay M Meythaler; John T Sladky; Richard J Barohn; James C Stevens
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2005-08

4.  Objective correlate of subjective pain perception by contact heat-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Yelena Granovsky; Michal Granot; Rony-Reuven Nir; David Yarnitsky
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 5.  Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  A K Asbury; D R Cornblath
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale.

Authors:  S B Bird; E W Dickson
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Anna Maria Carlsson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Contact heat-evoked potential stimulation for the evaluation of small nerve fiber function.

Authors:  Henri K Parson; Van T Nguyen; Michael-Angelo Orciga; Amanda L Boyd; Carolina M Casellini; Aaron I Vinik
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Operculoinsular cortex encodes pain intensity at the earliest stages of cortical processing as indicated by amplitude of laser-evoked potentials in humans.

Authors:  G D Iannetti; L Zambreanu; G Cruccu; I Tracey
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 10.  Pathology and functional diagnosis of small-fiber painful neuropathy.

Authors:  Sung-Tsang Hsieh
Journal:  Acta Neurol Taiwan       Date:  2010-06
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  How to diagnose neuropathic pain? The contribution from clinical examination, pain questionnaires and diagnostic tests.

Authors:  S La Cesa; S Tamburin; V Tugnoli; G Sandrini; S Paolucci; M Lacerenza; P Marchettini; G Cruccu; A Truini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 2.  Early Detection of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Focus on Small Nerve Fibres.

Authors:  Jamie Burgess; Bernhard Frank; Andrew Marshall; Rashaad S Khalil; Georgios Ponirakis; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Daniel J Cuthbertson; Rayaz A Malik; Uazman Alam
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-24

3.  Contact heat evoked potentials in knowledge workers and unskilled labors.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Yan-Ran Li; Hong-Fen Wang; Fang Cui; Li Ling; Fei Yang; Zhao-Hui Chen; Xu-Sheng Huang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.