Literature DB >> 15674102

Validation of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire for a German population.

M Nocon1, M Kulig, A Leodolter, P Malfertheiner, S N Willich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We describe the validation of a German-language version of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire in what is the first validation study of this patient questionnaire for a non-English speaking population. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is one of the most common diseases in primary care and has a significant negative impact on patients' quality of life. There is no gold standard for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, however, so the valid assessment of symptoms is especially important. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 5689 patients (92%) completed the questionnaire both before treatment and after 2 weeks. The results were tested for validity and reliability. Predictive validity was tested in a pilot study of 100 patients. Convergent validity was examined using the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Questionnaire for the assessment of disease-specific quality of life and the McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation for the assessment of therapeutic success.
RESULTS: Principal component analysis suggested a three-factor solution with the subscores heartburn, regurgitation, and dyspepsia. The internal consistencies of the subscores were between 0.84 and 0.86. Item difficulty ranged from 0.33 to 0.53, and corrected item-total correlation from 0.66 to 0.72. Effect sizes were between 0.8 and 1.0.
CONCLUSION: The German version of the questionnaire has good psychometric properties and is responsive to changes in health. Thus, we conclude that the German Reflux Disease Questionnaire is suitable for the assessment of heartburn, regurgitation, and treatment response, both in primary care settings and clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15674102     DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200502000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  12 in total

1.  Response to Ottonello et al.: Non-erosive reflux disease patients are more complex than the sole endoscopy tells us.

Authors:  Karin Kislig; Clive H Wilder-Smith; Michael M Bornstein; Adrian Lussi; Rainer Seemann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Efficacy and tolerability of hydrogen carbonate-rich water for heartburn.

Authors:  André-Michael Beer; Ralf Uebelhack; Ute Pohl
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 3.  Questionnaire based gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) assessment scales.

Authors:  V Pratap Mouli; Vineet Ahuja
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-23

4.  Halitosis and tongue coating in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease versus nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Karin Kislig; Clive H Wilder-Smith; Michael M Bornstein; Adrian Lussi; Rainer Seemann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Types and applications of cough-related questionnaires.

Authors:  Zhijing Wang; Miao Wang; Siwan Wen; Li Yu; Xianghuai Xu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Unrecognized GERD symptoms are associated with excessive daytime sleepiness in patients undergoing sleep studies.

Authors:  Nalini Guda; Susan Partington; Michael J Shaw; Gary Leo; Nimish Vakil
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  [Modern diagnostic tools for esophageal pathologies].

Authors:  A Kandulski; P Malfertheiner; J Weigt
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on work productivity despite therapy with proton pump inhibitors in Germany.

Authors:  M Gross; U Beckenbauer; J Burkowitz; H Walther; B Brueggenjuergen
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.175

9.  A prospective longitudinal cohort study: evolution of GERD symptoms during the course of pregnancy.

Authors:  Sara Fill Malfertheiner; Maximilian V Malfertheiner; Siegfried Kropf; Serban-Dan Costa; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  GERD assessment including pH metry predicts a high response rate to PPI standard therapy.

Authors:  Arne Kandulski; Ulrich Peitz; Klaus Mönkemüller; Helmut Neumann; Jochen Weigt; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.