Elbert S Huang1, Rita Gorawara-Bhat, Marshall H Chin. 1. Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. ehuang@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu <ehuang@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu>
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: New diabetes mellitus guidelines from the American Geriatrics Society promote the individualization of treatment goals and plans for patients aged 65 and older. Communicating with older patients about such complex medical decisions presents new challenges for providers. The self-reported healthcare goals, factors influencing these goals, and self-care practices of older patients with diabetes mellitus were explored. DESIGN: Exploratory study involving semistructured interviews. SETTING: Four clinics of a midwestern, urban academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 65 and older with type II diabetes mellitus (N=28). MEASUREMENTS: Semistructured, one-on-one interviews were conducted. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and evaluated for recurring themes using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: The majority of patients expressed their healthcare goals in a social and functional language, in contrast to the biomedical language of risk factor control and complication prevention, even when specifically asked about goals for diabetes mellitus care. Patient's predominant healthcare goals centered on maintaining their independence and their activities of daily living (71%). Medical experiences of friends and family (50%), social comparison with peers (7%), and medical professionals (43%) shaped patients' goals. Self-reported medication adherence and glucose monitoring was high, but more than one-quarter of patients failed to adhere to any dietary recommendations, and one-third failed to adhere to their exercise regimens. CONCLUSION: As diabetes mellitus care recommendations for older patients grow more complex, providers could enhance their communication about such medical decisions by exploring patients' specific circumstances and reframing diabetes mellitus treatment goals in patients' own language. These may be crucial steps to developing successful individualized care plans.
OBJECTIVES: New diabetes mellitus guidelines from the American Geriatrics Society promote the individualization of treatment goals and plans for patients aged 65 and older. Communicating with older patients about such complex medical decisions presents new challenges for providers. The self-reported healthcare goals, factors influencing these goals, and self-care practices of older patients with diabetes mellitus were explored. DESIGN: Exploratory study involving semistructured interviews. SETTING: Four clinics of a midwestern, urban academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 65 and older with type II diabetes mellitus (N=28). MEASUREMENTS: Semistructured, one-on-one interviews were conducted. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and evaluated for recurring themes using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: The majority of patients expressed their healthcare goals in a social and functional language, in contrast to the biomedical language of risk factor control and complication prevention, even when specifically asked about goals for diabetes mellitus care. Patient's predominant healthcare goals centered on maintaining their independence and their activities of daily living (71%). Medical experiences of friends and family (50%), social comparison with peers (7%), and medical professionals (43%) shaped patients' goals. Self-reported medication adherence and glucose monitoring was high, but more than one-quarter of patients failed to adhere to any dietary recommendations, and one-third failed to adhere to their exercise regimens. CONCLUSION: As diabetes mellitus care recommendations for older patients grow more complex, providers could enhance their communication about such medical decisions by exploring patients' specific circumstances and reframing diabetes mellitus treatment goals in patients' own language. These may be crucial steps to developing successful individualized care plans.
Authors: K R Lorig; P Ritter; A L Stewart; D S Sobel; B W Brown; A Bandura; V M Gonzalez; D D Laurent; H R Holman Journal: Med Care Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Melissa M Franks; Rachel C Hemphill; Amber J Seidel; Mary Ann Parris Stephens; Karen S Rook; James K Salem Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Sarah H M Robben; Maud M Heinen; Marieke Perry; Theo van Achterberg; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Henk J Schers; René J F Melis Journal: Health Expect Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Marshall H Chin; Melinda L Drum; Lei Jin; Morgan E Shook; Elbert S Huang; David O Meltzer Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Mary F Wyman; Daniel Liebzeit; Corrine I Voils; Barbara J Bowers; Elizabeth N Chapman; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Korey A Kennelty; Amy J H Kind; Julia Loosen; Nicole Rogus-Pulia; Melissa Dattalo Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2020-02-15
Authors: C Barrett Bowling; John N Booth; Monika M Safford; Heather E Whitson; Christine S Ritchie; Virginia G Wadley; Mary Cushman; Virginia J Howard; Richard M Allman; Paul Muntner Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 5.562