Literature DB >> 10923549

Barriers to communication about diabetes mellitus. Patients' and physicians' different view of the disease.

J Freeman1, R Loewe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of diabetes mellitus is difficult for both the patient and the clinician, and poor communication resulting from different conceptions of the disease and different treatment goals can exacerbate the problem.
METHODS: We used qualitative methods, including semistructured interviews with patients and clinicians and direct observation of clinical precepting sessions by trained observers at an inner-city family practice training site. Transcripts from these sessions were analyzed for content (with the help of Nud.ist software) to identify themes that highlight problem areas in clinician-patient communication.
RESULTS: The most important themes revolved around the concept of control, which was used in at least 3 different ways, and the concept of frustration. Frustration resulted from different understandings of the biology, physiology, and natural history of the disease, and approaches to treatment. In the interviews, clinicians often spontaneously acknowledged the multiple physical, psychological, and social obstacles to treatment confronted by their patients, but in observed practice they almost always focused entirely on managing blood sugar numbers.
CONCLUSIONS: Different conceptions of the term "control" affect the ability of patients and clinicians to communicate effectively. The tendencies of clinicians to view their own management strategy as scientific truth, and their focus on managing numbers rather than attempting to understand their patient's conception of disease and their treatment goals, lead to frustration and are serious obstacles to effective collaboration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10923549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  22 in total

1.  Factors in client-clinician interaction that influence hearing aid adoption.

Authors:  Laya Poost-Foroosh; Mary Beth Jennings; Lynn Shaw; Christine N Meston; Margaret F Cheesman
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  A Longitudinal Study of Interactions Between Health Professionals and People With Newly Diagnosed Diabetes.

Authors:  Anthony Dowell; Maria Stubbe; Lindsay Macdonald; Rachel Tester; Lesley Gray; Sue Vernall; Tim Kenealy; Nicolette Sheridan; Barbara Docherty; Devi-Ann Hall; Deborah Raphael; Kevin Dew
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  International challenges without borders: a descriptive study of family physicians' educational needs in the field of diabetes.

Authors:  Suzanne Murray; Patrice Lazure; Sara Schroter; Philipp J Leuschner; Peter Posel; Thomas Kellner; Richard D Jenkins
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Patient-centered communication in type 2 diabetes: The facilitating and constraining factors in clinical encounters.

Authors:  Dagmara Paiva; Liliana Abreu; Ana Azevedo; Susana Silva
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Factors Affecting the Quality of Diabetic Care in Primary Care Settings in Oman: A qualitative study on patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Azri; Hilal Al-Azri; Fatma Al-Hashmi; Samira Al-Rasbi; Kawther El-Shafie; Abdullah Al-Maniri
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-05-15

6.  Self-reported goals of older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Elbert S Huang; Rita Gorawara-Bhat; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  A qualitative study of perceived responsibility and self-blame in type 2 diabetes: reflections of physicians and patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Beverly; Marilyn D Ritholz; Kelly M Brooks; Brittney A Hultgren; Yishan Lee; Martin J Abrahamson; Katie Weinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patients' engagement in primary care: powerlessness and compounding jeopardy. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Nicolette F Sheridan; Timothy W Kenealy; Jacquie D Kidd; Jacqueline I G Schmidt-Busby; Jennifer E Hand; Deborah L Raphael; Ann M McKillop; Harold H Rea
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 9.  Emotional and quality-of-life aspects of diabetes management.

Authors:  William H Polonsky
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.810

10.  [Patient-centered health care for diabetes: we need to incorporate patients' perspectives and expectations].

Authors:  I Fernández Fernández
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.