Literature DB >> 15672827

Acquisition with partial and continuous reinforcement in pigeon autoshaping.

Daniel A Gottlieb1.   

Abstract

Contemporary time accumulation models make the unique prediction that acquisition of a conditioned response will be equally rapid with partial and continuous reinforcement, if the time between conditioned stimuli is held constant. To investigate this, acquisition of conditioned responding was examined in pigeon autoshaping under conditions of 100% and 25% reinforcement, holding intertrial interval constant. Contrary to what was predicted, evidence for slowed acquisition in partially reinforced animals was observed with several response measures. However, asymptotic performance was superior with 25% reinforcement. A switching of reinforcement contingencies after initial acquisition did not immediately affect responding. After further sessions, partial reinforcement augmented responding, whereas continuous reinforcement did not, irrespective of an animal's reinforcement history. Subsequent training with a novel stimulus maintained the response patterns. These acquisition results generally support associative, rather than time accumulation, accounts of conditioning.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15672827     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  9 in total

Review 1.  Time, rate, and conditioning.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; J Gibbon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Theoretical mechanisms underlying the trial-spacing effect in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  P B Barela
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-04

3.  Importance of trials versus accumulating time across trials in partially reinforced appetitive conditioning.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Ceyhun Sunsay
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

4.  The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations.

Authors:  A AMSEL
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Within-session Changes In Responding During Autoshaping And Automaintenance Procedures.

Authors:  F McSweeney; S Swindell; J Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: The dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Trial and intertrial durations in Pavlovian conditioning: issues of learning and performance.

Authors:  K M Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-10

8.  A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Behavioral studies of Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 12.449

  9 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Temporal contingency.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; Andrew R Craig; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Age differences in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning and extinction in rats.

Authors:  Heidi C Meyer; David J Bucci
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-10-11

Review 3.  Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.

Authors:  Patrick Anselme
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

4.  Extinction from a rationalist perspective.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; April Michele Williams
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-25

6.  Amphetamine-induced sensitization and reward uncertainty similarly enhance incentive salience for conditioned cues.

Authors:  Mike J F Robinson; Patrick Anselme; Kristen Suchomel; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with alpha lipoic acid and associative conditioning.

Authors:  Richard E Jones; Nicole Moes; Heather Zwickey; Christopher L Cunningham; William L Gregory; Barry Oken
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 7.217

8.  Separation of time-based and trial-based accounts of the partial reinforcement extinction effect.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Amanda M Woods; Travis P Todd
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 9.  Time to rethink the neural mechanisms of learning and memory.

Authors:  Charles R Gallistel; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.877

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.